Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 October 7

< October 6	October 8 >

October 7[edit]

File:Hiba Nawab.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

originally tagged for speedy deletion by Velella with the reason "no evidence that this is appropriately licensed or that it is the copyright of the wikipedia user" FASTILY 01:19, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - uploader has a history of copyright violations. In this edit, you can see the uploader has retracted the "self" claim on the license. This image is splatted all over the internet and there is no proof the claimed license. -- Whpq (talk) 12:57, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paul Foot letter 09-12-88.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

scanned image of someone's handwritten letter; derivative of non-free content FASTILY 01:20, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 13:40, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hydril Annular BOP Patent App.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 October 15. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hydril Annular BOP Patent App.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hydril Compact BOP Patent.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

US patent is from 1996; the license directly states all patents must be published before 3-1-1989 Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:39, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mandate Prisoners Decoration.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Works are automatically copyrighted, even if released to the public. The copyright rationale on this page is just wrong. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:01, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ets-logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A similar file uploaded in the commons Ra1han (talk) 06:48, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CI Games.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as PD-ineligible-USonly. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:11, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is this {{PD-textlogo}} or is there sufficient creativity in the design to take it out of the simple bracket? Nthep (talk) 13:04, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment When I uploaded the file, I was not sure whether it is free or not because I am not sure how high the TOO is in Poland. @Nthep: If you believe the image is free under the laws of Poland, you can go ahead and just move it to Commons, as I won't be opposing the move. Lordtobi (✉) 13:34, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as non-free. c:Commons:Threshold of originality does not mention Poland but I gather from individual deletion discussions that it's rather low. [1][2][3] – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:37, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:32, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Need discussion on whether it meets commons:COM:TOO in the United States; English Wikipedia rules cares only about USan TOO last I checked.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:04, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yup {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:50, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.