Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 October 11

< October 10	October 12 >

October 11[edit]

File:Yale bowl birds eye view.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

From the uploader's private helicopter, but oddly has "Google" imprinted on it. Look on the left right at the top of the press box and on the right just below the box seat area. I never knew that the words "Google" floated in the air and were visible from a private helicopter. B (talk) 00:07, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - uploader has clearly lied about the source -- Whpq (talk) 12:48, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this one is pretty clear cut that this was taken from copyrighted Google Maps aerial photography. Randomeditor1000 (talk) 16:17, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Covidean plant north haven.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If the user's other upload from his private helicopter is a copyvio, so is this one. B (talk) 00:08, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - uploader has lied about taking this photo from his private helicopter in another image with a google watermark. There is no good reason to believe this image came from his private helicopter. -- Whpq (talk) 12:49, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dcsoundtrack.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 October 19. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:01, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dcsoundtrack.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RussBerrieGregory.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 October 19. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:01, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:RussBerrieGregory.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ThomasKennedy.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 October 19. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:01, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:ThomasKennedy.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Newfoundland Hotel (1926).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Refferal, as something doesn't make sense. Title says (1926) , file description says 1940. I can't find a biography for the photographer... ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:36, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:24, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: 1926 appears to denote the year that the hotel was opened, so there is no conflict, ShakespeareFan00. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:00, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Egyptian MIG 21s during Yom Kippur War.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 October 19. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:02, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Egyptian MIG 21s during Yom Kippur War.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hans Mustad (1837 – 1918).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:02, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link, no author details, but image is clearly pre 1918. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:00, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:24, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. No action required. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:09, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:StaggField.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image of the old Stagg Field being used under a claim of fair use. There are a gracious plenty free images of it, e.g. File:Marshall Field, Chicago, Carlisle vs. Chicago, Nov. 23, 1907.jpg. (It's a bit confusing because Marshall Field was renamed Stagg Field - but both Stagg Field and Marshall Field are the same place. (The stadium was torn down in the 50s and a new, smaller, stadium with the same name was subsequently built.) This photo MIGHT be free but it would need to be proven. Unfortunately, the University of Chicago, like most schools, claims copyright on everything they touch, so even if it was published in a work whose copyright lapsed, they aren't going to make it easy to find that out. B (talk) 12:23, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not necessary as per B.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:50, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Firoz Khan.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This si claimed as own work but is clearly a posed publicity shot. Uploader has a history of copyright violations and is claimed own work on images that are clear copyright violations. See File:Nikhil Khurana.jpg which is from a Tribune India article. No good reason to believe the claim of own work. Whpq (talk) 13:01, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note - The uploader has been blocked for sockpuppetry. -- Whpq (talk) 17:10, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Zetland.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An image that attributes a Flickr user. I couldn't find this particular photo in the flickr user's uploads (though it is signed and is obviously from this flickr user even if he subsequently deleted it). None of his photos are tagged with a license acceptable here. The :en uploader tagged it with PD-self but that is only after first tagging it by permission only and claiming to have permission from the flickr user. So there is no evidence that this or any other license is valid for this image. B (talk) 15:29, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stink-movie.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) to non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:02, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like Flickrwashing - it was uploaded to Flickr the same day it was uploaded here and the user (who has the same name as the director of this movie) has no other uploads. (It probably qualifies for fair use). B (talk) 20:35, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely mis-licensed. I have changed the licensing to non-free poster and added a fair use. Salavat (talk) 23:51, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Twenty One Pilots - Bandito Tour 2018–19 poster.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not being used for any pages apart from sandbox. MikeØwen ^{Let's have a nice cup of tea and a friendly chat} 20:57, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.