Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 March 24

< March 23	March 25 >

March 24[edit]

File:Nothing Lasts Forever by Roderick Thorp, Cover Art.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are two book covers used in the article Nothing Lasts Forever (Thorp novel), the original and this, a cover of the reprint 33 years later. The original book cover is used in the infobox and this reprint book cover is used in the background section without any critical commentary about the cover. The reprint cover fails WP:NFCC#3a in that the original book cover already is used in the article for means of identification and fails WP:NFCC#8 because there is no commentary about the cover thereby doing nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the book and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the book. Aspects (talk) 03:07, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:25 anni int brigades.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free poster art being used in International Brigades#Status after the war. No source is provided for the file so it's hard to verify its copyright status as required by WP:NFCC#10a or whether it has been previously published as required by WP:NFCC#4. In addition, the poster itself is not the subject of any sourced discussion at within the article so the context required by WP:NFCC#8 is lacking so its usage appears to be more decorative than not. File's description says the photo is from 1961, but I don't think that's old enough for {{PD-USonly}}, {{PD-Czech}} or another free license, but not sure. If this cannot be converted to a free license, then non-free usage does not comply with WP:NFCC and I suggest remove from the article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jerzy Grotowski.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be replaceable with commons:File:Jerzy Grotowski.jpg which is freely licensed, thus failing WP:NFCC#1. Using FFD rather than the Rfu tag because it's a sketch rather than a photo. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JohnMorton.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image is shadowing an almost identical Commons file with minimally higher resolution. It should probably be deleted unless someone wants to preserve it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:38, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sugar pipe.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused graffiti or mural. The uploader's edit history didn't show anything about the provenance and the copyright status may be iffy. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:38, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Without knowing the location or artist, we cannot know if the underlying creative work is free and/or if any sort of FoP applies to it. DMacks (talk) 14:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logo for Stonegate Pub Company.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Logo superceded by File:Stonegate Pub Company logo.png. Cloudbound (talk) 20:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sundowner building.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. File:Jackson Sundown.jpg was split and moved to this file name. — ξ ^xplicit 01:56, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused copy of a file which was split incorrectly. I suggest deleting this file and splitting File:Jackson Sundown.jpg correctly instead:

Delete the file.
Undelete the first file and the associated revisions of the file information page.
Move the first file and its file information page to another file name.
Undelete the second file and the remaining revisions of the file information page. Stefan2 (talk) 21:23, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support It's clear that the file descriptions and licenses were mixed up. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.