Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 27

< December 26	December 28 >

December 27[edit]

File:Idsc logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Article deleted as WP:G11, so non-free use is no longer relevant/possible. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely the uploader owns the copyright on this. Needs proof of permission from the organization or be should be converted to fair use. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ICIGLogo4.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Doesn't meet WP:NFCC#1 because an alternative logo is currently in-use on the relevant article. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely the uploader owns the copyright on this. Needs proof of permission from the Iran Compress Industrial Group or be should be converted to fair use. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Millenium Park Fountain people.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:16, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Millenium Park Fountain people.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Millenium Park Fountain 2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:17, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Millenium Park Fountain 2.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wilhelm Crinius Oak Leaves.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 with no contextual significance and its omission would not be detrimental to understanding. The rationale applies to all three articles where the image appears. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is part of K.e.coffman's ongoing de-Nazification campaign. Retention of the picture certainly "significantly increase readers' understanding" of who we're talking about. I suspect this nomination has less to do with wp policy and more to do with IDONTLIKEIT. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:15, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris troutman: How does the image "significantly increase readers' understanding"? K.e.coffman (talk) 05:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- I believe the above iVote should be discounted as it seems to be motivated by the dislike towards me as the nominator, vs being guided by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ξ ^xplicit 06:38, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dd2 kk shot6.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused video game screenshot, no foreseeable use FASTILY 08:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Americade 1981.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:17, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Band promotional photo; dubious self-work claim FASTILY 08:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amlan Barai Portrait.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:17, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused vanity image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Animal Crossing icon.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused logo, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:28, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ancient Witch.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, possible copyvio (see watermark in bottom right corner) FASTILY 08:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amin Al Hafiz and King Hussein of Jordan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

notable historical photo, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 08:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Altia Michel 1965.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a screenshot of a film/movie; dubious self-work claim FASTILY 08:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:American goal.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear original publication date, possible derivative of non-free content FASTILY 08:34, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Americade Raid-1983.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low res, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Animikh Roy (Profile Pic).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missing evidence of permission; uploader is not photographer/copyright holder FASTILY 08:36, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amllin Aguri team logo.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused logo, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:37, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JosephLoeffler.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image, not encyclopedic, similar image was deleted in 2014. XeroxKleenex (talk) 09:34, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Portervillecollage.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty sure that we can get a collage from freely licensed images for Porterville, California, meaning that this one violates WP:NFCC#1. Now maybe the images in the collage themselves are freely licensed but we'd need evidence for each one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alfred Makotsi Photo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image for a person who had had his article deleted at afd. No foreseeable use Whpq (talk) 16:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anything&whatever.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative of copyrighted product packaging. Kelly ^hi! 18:09, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Would this work under fair use?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:18, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCCP#4 requires previous publication. The containers obviously have previous publication, and the image of the containers is under a free license, so it would need to be some sort of hybrid licensing. Do we need to address File:Whatever-Anything.jpg at the same time and in the same way? ★ Bigr Tex 14:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: fair use for what article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 22:58, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.