Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 October 3

< October 2	October 4 >

October 3[edit]

File:Southwest Air Logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Old non-free logo fails WP:NFCC#8. RJaguar3 | u | t 01:55, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jennifer Lien.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My goodness, that's just too much trouble. Jdavidb (talk • contribs) 05:16, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a doctored version of Jennifer Lien's mugshot that was uploaded by User:Ocampa1 and then added to Jennifer Lien's page by User:203.26.123.208 with the caption "Lien in a 2015 artwork." Jdavidb (talk • contribs) 05:00, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To be perfectly clear the existence of this image and the way it was used look like vandalism to me. Jdavidb (talk • contribs) 05:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Suffolk CWGC Cemetery 1848793584.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete Nthep (talk) 14:03, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Practical duplicate of Commons ( which is at a much higher resolution.). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:23, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think it is a very bad idea to upload {{keep local}} files which block higher resolution copies of the same files on Commons. I'm not sure what FFD policy says about deleting such files. WP:CSD says that the file is ineligible for WP:CSD#F8, but the CSD policy doesn't apply to deletion discussions. The WP:OWN policy applies to deletion discussions, though. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:43, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete local copy to let Commons higher-resolution image thru. This user only tagged it as keep local because they had a bone to pick with Commons. And the user apparently tagged all of their uploads this way. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:13, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Kelly ^hi! 11:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brooch ScillonianIII.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While this photograph is no doubt the work of the photographer/ uploader, the underlying work is almost certainly the copyright-protected work of the Scillonian III ferry and therefore represents a copyright violation. For the same reason a person cannot take a picture of a Mickey Mouse toy and claim the photograph has an independent copyright, neither can an independent copyright claim be made for this image. No claim of fair use is being made, and neither is a claim of derivative work copyright. Therefore, Wikipedia cannot host it. KDS4444^Talk 09:31, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brooch Scillonian.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While this photograph is no doubt the work of the photographer/ uploader, the underlying work is almost certainly the copyright-protected work of the Scillonian III ferry and therefore represents a copyright violation. For the same reason a person cannot take a picture of a Mickey Mouse toy and claim the photograph has an independent copyright, neither can an independent copyright claim be made for this image. No claim of fair use is being made, and neither is a claim of derivative work copyright. Therefore, Wikipedia cannot host it. KDS4444^Talk 09:34, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Diagram1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Only used in userspace, no description. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:39, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

note: the file is used here: https://en.m.wikibooks.org/wiki/Digital_Signal_Processing/Discrete_Fourier_Transform — Preceding unsigned comment added by MickLinux (talk • contribs) 2015-10-05T23:52:12

Withdrawn Is it possible to add a description from that, so it can be moved to Commons? Thanks.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:24, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Connections.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused , no description. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:46, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Torchwood Miracle Day Title Card.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ ^xplicit 03:59, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Practical duplicate for Commons hosted image Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:30, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This logo is obviously more complex than File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg which was deemed to be copyrightable in the United Kingdom by a British court. The letters seem to be about equally complex and then there is the stylistic line below the text. There is no chance that this is free in the source country. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:05, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TeleCAD-GIS Copper Access Network.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of copyrighted software. No permission from copyright holder given. czar 16:59, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Inova.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Logo is likely PD-simple but now that its article is gone, it's unlikely to be used in any other capacity. czar 17:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TeleCAD-GIS Enterprise Architecture.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Listed as both "self-made" and authored by a company. If the latter, we need permission from the company. If the former, the latter should be removed. Either way, this image is unlikely to be used now that its article is deleted. czar 17:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daily Kos logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused old logo. Kelly ^hi! 18:38, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zavoisky.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image is practical duplicate of Commons, but not straight F8 as there is a licensing concern. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:37, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the copyright status in the United States is unclear, then the file should be properly indicated as unfree, or the file should be deleted. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:06, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yatsushiro Sea.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Practical duplicate, but unsure why this wasn't considered an F8. Was the local copy updated?. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yate logo.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Practical duplicate for Commons file. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:04, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain in more details why is this a duplicate? Where is the duplicate image so I can use that instead? 84.232.129.164 (talk) 17:24, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At Commons - Commons:File:Yate_logo.svg - The local copy has been tagged as F8 and will be removed shortly I think.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:25, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yakov Knyazhnin.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Practical duplicate for similar but not identically sized commons image. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:16, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Canal Clasico.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now available at Commons under claim of public domain due to simplicity. BethNaught (talk) 21:29, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LaserChess GameScreen.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Has been flagged as "derivative work incorporating another work [...] no information on the source(s) of the incorporated work(s)" for a year and a half, I'm not sure if this fell through a crack somewhere. No obvious way of knowing whether the uploader is the developer genuinely releasing this screenshot as public domain, a screenshot of a game genuinely released as PD, or someone just not knowing what public domain means. McGeddon (talk) 22:30, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it looks like the uploader also claimed to be the copyright holder of a 1987 magazine cover and released that into the public domain too (it's been sorted out since), so this is probably just a random screenshot. --McGeddon (talk) 22:32, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.