Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 April 30

< April 29	May 1 >

April 30[edit]

File:Wagreenslogo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

superseded by vector version and File:WA Greens logo (historical).png Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:09, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The shooting news.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, "it is a company logo of mine". Wikipedia is not free webhosting. B (talk) 03:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1977 Travel Weekly Article Gailen David.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid fair-use rationale. The biographical information can be conveyed by text with the newspaper as source. No significant image details, that would require an image. GermanJoe (talk) 07:27, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Savvy Stews.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid fair-use rationale, both persons have separate images available. Permission to use not verifiable (blocked uploader). GermanJoe (talk) 07:31, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lithuania men national basketball team in 1992.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:10, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non free image that is largely decorative in an article with many free images, and the possibility of creating more. It is unnecessary for reader's understanding to see this image of this particular team. Image fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 12:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a historically significant image not only visually identifying the first Lithuania men's national basketball team after regaining the country's independence, but it also illustrates the historic game versus possibly the greatest basketball team ever formed. There is no other version of this kind of image which makes it irreplaceable. By the way, it is not commercial work and you cannot roll-back time to this particular event and take picture of these players standing together during it. Visual illustration of important and medals-winning team is important for me if I would be article's reader not less than informative text. Furthermore, during this game the biggest lose in the Lithuanian team's history happened so it undoubtedly was historically significant. -- Pofka (talk) 14:39, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why does anyone need to see this copyrighted image to understand that the game was important. ? Text alone can convey this adequately - Peripitus (Talk) 10:41, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Text cannot display it visually. Following your point almost all non-free image of events should be deleted because they are described in text as well. This is historically significant image. NOT COMMERCIAL, so it doesn't fail one of the rationale points as well. If this image will be deleted as others from this article, I'm immediately planning to nominate dozens of non-free images from the same category because they simply are of the same type: meetings, sport events. Everything should be deleted as well following this logic. By the way, I'm surprised how these files were deleted because there absolutely is no arguments provided in discussions (or anywhere else) by administrator TLSuda who deleted them. Very interesting way to solve things. -- Pofka (talk) 11:32, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.