Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 June 7

< June 6	June 8 >

June 7[edit]

File:LCAC.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G6 by Kafziel (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a low resolution duplicate of this file on Commons. Nominated for deletion because the photos have a slightly different tint, not exact duplicates. XLerate (talk) 12:09, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just went ahead and deleted it. Apparently there's some other LCAC photo at that location now (which is confusing, because my version was uploaded in Feb 2006 and this one is from Aug 2007, and I don't see it in the file history... but I'm not an expert on image matters). At any rate, my original low-res version is definitely inferior to the current Commons one. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 18:17, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Benssl2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 16:32, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC00999.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 17:04, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mgm RD Tree.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary picture, only used in userspace, author is fine with deletion (see file description page) Acather96 (talk) 17:32, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC01007.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to low quality. Redundant to File:The Everett Clinic.JPG. Acather96 (talk) 17:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mill Creek.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to low quality. Redundant to File:The Everett Clinic.JPG Acather96 (talk) 17:40, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gunderson Building.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to low quality Acather96 (talk) 17:41, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Miss World 1976 Map (old).PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded by superior File:Miss World 1976 Map.PNG Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:48, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC02344.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 17:56, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC02219.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 18:00, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC02087.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 18:00, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC02148.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 18:00, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JML and KoolHerc2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 18:44, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JML CD cover SM.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic, possible advertising Acather96 (talk) 18:45, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Movpgfrbrx.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Only used in a user talk page discussion from 2005 to show a user where the move tab was on an article page. Acather96 (talk) 18:46, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lightedmatch.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 18:47, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete the match. and for good measure, start cursing the darkness HominidMachinae (talk) 02:47, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lenticel.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic due to low quality and unidentifiable subject. Only used in userspace. Acather96 (talk) 18:54, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete. Sorry Lenticel. --Efe (talk) 13:43, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sine Cos Proofs.pdf[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

not used, hardly useful. damiens.rf 19:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this file. Damiens.rf claims it is not used, but if you look at the viewing count at http://stats.grok.se/, you will see that it has averaged 208 views per month over a period of 27 months (2009-03 through 2011-05). That is pretty darn good for a technical proof article. Damiens.rf also says it is "hardly useful." Is Damiens.rf competent to make this judgement. Probably not. Math students will not thank you if you delete this file. Wahrmund (talk) 22:04, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wahrmund, I acknowledge that it is a useful file, but this is an encyclopedia, not a file sharing site. You are welcome to download and keep this file and share it through one of those entities, but this file serves no useful encyclopedic purpose. Lastly, questioning Damiens' competency in the field of mathematics is below the belt. Not only is it completely unnecessary, but it is completely beside the point. Please keep your comments focused on a user's contributions, not the contributor. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Move to wikisource or wikibooks perhaps it needs to be converted to wikicode as well. 65.94.45.185 (talk) 06:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Note that we do treat this material, at Proofs_of_trigonometric_identities#Angle_sum_identities. The PDF treatment is significantly more attractive however, including a more attractive diagram. At the very least, the prettier colour diagram should be extracted from the PDF. But I think we should also review our article, to question why we are not presenting the material as clearly as this PDF. It seems to me there is a good case that our current article may be too long, and should be broken up into smaller more accessible articles which people can print out as PDFs, that would be much like this one, if they want to. Jheald (talk) 21:42, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, perhaps after moving to wikibooks or someplace. Maybe for some purposes a PDF is better than a web page, but wikipedia is the latter and there are virtues in terms of scaling up and down to small and large screens, searchability, linking to other wikipedia articles, editability, etc. If the wording on the PDF is better than what we have at Proofs of trigonometric identities#Angle sum identities, then copy it over. Kingdon (talk) 00:22, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:NOTTEXTBOOK and WP:CFORK. It would be impossible for most people to edit this without special software, which is ok for an image which should not be changed much, but this is exposition. The content itself is not encyclopedic for the most part and what is is already contained in other articles.--RDBury (talk) 07:07, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.