Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 June 2

< June 1	June 3 >

June 2[edit]

File:CPS IN1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic, unused, poor quality photograph of a non-notable pharmacy, uploaded for a deleted article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:29, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CPS In2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic, unused, poor quality photograph of a non-notable pharmacy, uploaded for a deleted article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:29, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Huawei Symantec Unofficial Emblem.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The volunteer response team has been contacted (VRTS ticket # 2011060110015156) by a representative of Huawei Symantec to object to this "unofficial emblem" as a misrepresentative derivative work of their intellectual property, and have requested its deletion. As it constitutes original research, is unfree and does not add significantly to the article in a way that would meet the non-free content criteria, I propose that we honour this request. Skomorokh 13:50, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedied as copyvio. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:57, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RumsfeldEconomist.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:17, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary non-free magazine cover. In the article about Rumsfield, it's used without a rationale just because the cover story is barely mentioned. In the article about Abu Ghraib, the cover is mentioned among a list of mentions of news coverage about the subject. All that's said is "The cover of The Economist, which had backed President Bush in the 2000 election, carried a photo of the abuse with the words "Resign, Rumsfeld."". The cover image itself seems to be adding few to what's already stated on the article's text. There's also nothing to believe this cover image was specially notable among many other magazine covers covering relevant events. damiens.rf 19:06, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. May even be PD, at least in the States, as the central photo is PD-USGov-Military, and the text surrounding it would appear to be PD-Ineligible. Given the slightness of the copyright taking, the image is arguably sufficiently additionally informative to be justifiable, since it communicates more than text just how directly The Economist (not a stereotypically left-leaning publication) delivered its message, which does add to reader understanding of just how powerfully this played in the media. The central photo itself became emblematic of the scandal (perhaps because the media found it family-friendly enough to feature), so should definitely appear prominently in the article (especially as it is PD); but it my view we do gain an extra understanding by seeing how it played in the media. Jheald (talk) 14:51, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Jheald. — BQZip01 — ^talk 17:02, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Black Mask3501.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free magazine cover only used to decorate a list. damiens.rf 19:14, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The list being a list of articles of the magazine depicted on the cover. Should a paragraph be added tot he article to make it more encyclopedic? The list was spun off a related topic. ~ К3вину (RSVP) (What) 20:29, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Parker125.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free magazine cover used to decorate a gallery. damiens.rf 19:16, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think there is some value in showing readers how the look of the title has changed over time; but that needs to be presented in connection with at least some text, which simply isn't there in the article in its current form. Jheald (talk) 15:02, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FreeBodyDiagram200509041700.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:10, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned physics diagram. Kelly ^hi! 20:55, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and move to Wikimedia Commons. Potentially useful, no need to delete, licensing is OK. Acather96 (talk) 17:29, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Agat map.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned JPG map. Kelly ^hi! 21:38, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and as redundant to File:Guam map Agat.png. Acather96 (talk) 17:31, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Caymans Turtle Victoria.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, possibly non-free. Kelly ^hi! 21:39, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mgm RD Leaves.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary image of unidentified plant. See also File:Mgm RD Tree.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 21:42, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I don't know if you meant to include File:Mgm RD Tree.jpg in this nomination, but if you did you forgot to add the FFD template. For the sake of due process, I've started another FFD for that file. Acather96 (talk) 17:34, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cardigan connor300.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence uploader is the copyright holder...web resolution and lack of metadata suggests otherwise. Kelly ^hi! 22:07, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blogicsm2.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned screenshot. Kelly ^hi! 22:08, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hugo Anzorreguy.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader unlikely to be copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 22:09, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gradascevicmap2.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned PNG map. Kelly ^hi! 22:10, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Birobidzhan flag.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, superseded by File:Coat of Arms of Birobidzhan.png. Kelly ^hi! 22:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Russu decameron10 7.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 22:12, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PRRD.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:10, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned PNG map. Kelly ^hi! 22:13, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons and rename to File:Peace River Regional District.png; 65.94.45.185 (talk) 04:44, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TwoRuBisCOquestions.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leftover image from ancient talk page discussion. Kelly ^hi! 22:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FtStJohn.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned PNG map. Kelly ^hi! 22:16, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons for use on those Wikipedias who don't use the extremely complex locator template we do. 65.94.45.185 (talk) 04:42, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TmblrRdg.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned PNG map. Kelly ^hi! 22:16, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons for use on those Wikipedias who don't use the extremely complex locator template we do. 65.94.45.185 (talk) 04:42, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jiangzhong Campus1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 22:18, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GUI.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned screenshot. Kelly ^hi! 22:27, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not a GUI image. 65.94.45.185 (talk) 04:42, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MacKenzie.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned PNG map. Kelly ^hi! 22:28, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons for use on those Wikipedias who don't use the extremely complex locator template we do. 65.94.45.185 (talk) 04:41, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WllmsLk.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned PNG map. Kelly ^hi! 22:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons for use on those Wikipedias who don't use the extremely complex locator template we do. 65.94.45.185 (talk) 04:42, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nanmoku.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 22:38, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2004 Hostage Video of Nicholas Berg.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much same image here File:NickBergandFiveMen.JPG. damiens.rf 22:39, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - You're right. Totally redundant. Moved the fair use rationale to the original one and transferred the link. Cheers! Palm_Dogg (talk) 00:58, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chetwynd.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned PNG map. Kelly ^hi! 22:39, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons for use on those Wikipedias who don't use the extremely complex locator template we do. 65.94.45.185 (talk) 06:15, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taizhou small.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned map, no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 22:40, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Staudingerreduction.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned chem image. Kelly ^hi! 23:27, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and move to Wikimedia Commons. Potentially useful, no need to delete, licensing is OK. Acather96 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sportrait05.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 23:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Weaver bird nest.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to File:Weaver bird nest.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 23:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Priene - Temple of Athena (2004).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:10, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 23:51, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons, can't see any particular reason why we shouldn't believe the copyright claim, and the image is useful enough. (Presence of a person in the centre is not so obtrusive as to make the image unuseable, and the Priene temple isn't exactly overrepresented on Commons so far.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:41, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:246triethylbenzene.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned chem image. Kelly ^hi! 23:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons and rename, since this is a chemical reaction image. 65.94.47.217 (talk) 05:16, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete redundant to File:246triethylbenzene.png. That one also needs a rename as this is the synthesis reaction rather than the molecule. Yoenit (talk) 14:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.