Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 March 24

< March 23	March 25 >

March 24

Image:Comint-switzerland.jpg

Image:Comint-switzerland.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Schutz (notify | contribs).

Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 00:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Incomplete IfD"? Actually, it's a completed IFD; see Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 March 4#Image:Comint-switzerland.jpg. Much as I'd like to say delete again (since the reasons for keeping it were totally bogus), it has actually been ruled a "keep". —Angr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 16:21, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image kept -Nv8200p talk 02:45, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Drift screen.JPG

Image:Drift screen.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Somewhere123 (notify | contribs).

Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 00:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not only orphaned, but would need trimmed due to excessive white areas around the screenshot. JeremyMcCracken (talk) 03:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eiffel_Tower_New_Year2007.jpg

Image:Eiffel_Tower_New_Year2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Prashant_bala (notify | contribs).

Copyright violation, the night-time illumination of the Eiffel Tower is copyrighted. Redundant to the many free (daytime) pictures Nilf anion (talk) 01:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in accordance with SNTE's copyfraud claims. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 16:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lifehouse.jpg

Image:Lifehouse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ckmaharg (notify | contribs).

Replaceable non-free use image. Band still together, and still active, free image is available, and fact that one is not here does not permit non-free images to be used. Ejfetters (talk) 02:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:14 jennylee lgl.jpg

Image:14 jennylee lgl.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pseudotype (notify | contribs).

Unused, no context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 02:04, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BRITDOC FILM FESTIVAL.png

Image:BRITDOC FILM FESTIVAL.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Charlottedale (notify | contribs).

Unused, unlikely to be of encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 02:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CraigTurnbull1.jpg

Image:CraigTurnbull1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Brow69 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned Oli Filth^(talk) 02:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Beijing2008GamesOverlogo.jpg

Image:Beijing2008GamesOverlogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Deeptrivia (notify | contribs).

What makes this image PD? -Nard 03:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the source of the image clearly encouraging people to "Download this image and put it everywhere!" deeptrivia (talk) 16:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons image showing through. -Nv8200p talk 01:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DFA Ringle.jpg

Image:DFA Ringle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Anthonyd3ca (notify | contribs).

Unnotable non-free use album cover, hardly differs from Image:GoodCharlotte-DanceFloorAnthem.jpg , not noteworthy enough, and not needed, first image is good enough 74.204.40.46 (talk) 05:40, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This image is higher resolution that the other. I'm not sure if it's large enough to be too high-res for fair-use, however. JeremyMcCracken (talk) 03:31, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Yonas Hailemeskel Image.JPG

Image:Yonas Hailemeskel Image.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Yonas Hailemeskel Image (notify | contribs).

UE. Not used anywhere and probably just spam for the website listed. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No copyright information supplied for a rather obviously owned image Bueller 007 (talk) 08:35, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Applications of artificial intelligence.pdf

Image:Applications of artificial intelligence.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ibr afah (notify | contribs).

Original research. Hut 8.5 10:07, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Azipod Project Guide 4-1-0.pdf

Image:Azipod Project Guide 4-1-0.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Corkstera (notify | contribs).

Original research, unencyclopedic, copyright violation Hut 8.5 10:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BELBIC full text.pdf

Image:BELBIC full text.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Leeder78 (notify | contribs).

Original research, copyright violation Hut 8.5 10:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Antenna paper.pdf

Image:Antenna paper.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jeevan Vemagiri (notify | contribs).

Original research. Hut 8.5 10:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dignetbk.pdf

Image:Dignetbk.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Benschop (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader, Wikipedia is not a free web host MER-C 11:35, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as orphaned and unencyclopedic and per WP:NOT#BLOG. Unlikely to be a copyvio, though, since the uploader is almost certainly the copyright holder. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 16:34, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Thestratonks.jpg

Image:Thestratonks.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by User:QueenSupreme89 (notify | contribs).

Image is a screenshot but is not licenced as such -- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 11:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BIOSTEEL.pdf

Image:BIOSTEEL.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Arundhati_bakshi (notify | contribs).

Wikipedia is not a free web host, Orphaned, Absent uploader MER-C 12:04, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ComponentLevel.pdf

Image:ComponentLevel.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lihsien (notify | contribs).

Original research, Orphaned, Absent uploader MER-C 12:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DRAM_Circuit_System_Test_Experience.pdf

Image:DRAM_Circuit_System_Test_Experience.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lihsien (notify | contribs).

Original research, Orphaned, Absent uploader MER-C 12:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mymathproject.pdf

Image:Mymathproject.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Berasomnath (notify | contribs).

Copy of school project => Wikipedia is not a free web host, Orphaned, Absent uploader MER-C 12:07, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nmciswem.pdf

Image:Nmciswem.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MarkusSchulze (notify | contribs).

Original research, Orphaned, Wikipedia is not a free webhost. MER-C 12:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Kept.  Imagine is in use, and there's no consensus here that this image exceeds the usual latitude given to images with respect to Original Research. WilyD 17:55, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Aldwych Map Mockup.png

Image:Aldwych Map Mockup.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by McDRye (notify | contribs).

This appears to be original research (WP:NOR), given the material under the summary heading. —TreasuryTag—t—c 13:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly disagree - It's a plain graphic representation of where the station is/was situated, and as such is no different from any other Wiki editor-created map or diagram used in place of copyrighted versions. Nick Cooper (talk) 15:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - it's speculating as to how a station that closed many, many years ago, would fit into our current transport network if it were open. The key words being speculating and if. Such material would require a source (WP:CITE) to show that the way the picture depicts it is indeed the way the map would work. —TreasuryTag—t—c 15:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - As JediLofty has pointed out, the Underground Map/Diagram works to set rules and as this is a case of a station which still exists and much of the infrastructure for it to be operational still in place, there are a very limited number of ways in which is would be represented. 86.140.196.181 has shown how it was represented when still open, and you will see that it is essentially the same as the disputed image, with the exception of the line being "dotted," which is the standard way of indicating a peak-time only service, although there are plenty of historic examples of it not being "dotted," as well. The branch consists of a single line and for virtually all its working life was operated by a single shuttle train running between Holborn and Aldwych (as it was at the time of 86.140.196.181's example), hence it is not shown as linking directly into Piccadilly line proper, even though in practical terms it is for the purposes of stock movement. If the station was still open now, it can be said with virtually absolute certainty that it would still be a shuttle, and would appear on the map as suggested. Nick Cooper (talk) 14:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree - I think the idea of having an image of what it would look like on today's map is a great idea. It visually helps the mind imagine where it is. The said graphic could be improved though and taking into account Transport for London is publicly owned it could in fact be in the public interest to use a section of the copyrighted map to represent realistically where Aldwych station is located. An example of how this would look can be found here http://img395.imageshack.us/img395/9227/aldwychft9.jpg

Alternatively a section of a 1993/1994 could equally be used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.196.181 (talk • contribs) 20:56, 24 March 2008

Disagree - the image is specifically relevant to the Aldwych tube station article and shows the location of a now-closed railway station in relation to still-existing stations on the same network. Such use is documented at Wikipedia:WikiProject_London_Transport/Manual_of_style#Disused_Stations. Bazza (talk) 13:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The London Underground map is pretty iconic, with predictable methods for adding new stations. The image does a very good job of illustrating how the Aldwych station would look on a current LU map if the station was still open. While it is a user created image, I don't see that WP:OR can apply here. -- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 13:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

illustrating how the Aldwych station would look on a current LU map if the station was still open - how do you know this? —TreasuryTag—t—c 17:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because the way stations are added to the LU map is predictable. If you know what station it is next to, and what line the station serves/served, it can only really be added to the map one way!-- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 09:02, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- it is helpful and useful and personally I think it is quite interesting to see how it would look on a modern map. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.5.15.51 (talk) 16:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:DaBrat.jpg

Image:DaBrat.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Shine_77 (notify | contribs).

Appears to be the work of a professional photographer and taken in a studio - copyright probably not owned by uploader. PhilKnight (talk) 14:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The image appears to have been lifted from this site.-- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 16:42, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Elvismccartney.jpg

Image:Elvismccartney.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mr._Manu (notify | contribs).

Several free images are used in the article - this doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ozmir.jpg

Image:Ozmir.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by QueenSupreme89 (notify | contribs).

Image is tagged as {{PD-self}} but is clearly a screenshot from a movie or TV show. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 16:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

discussion closed as image is at Commons, not Wikipedia. —Angr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 16:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cursive.png

Image:Cursive.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sotakeit (notify | contribs).

Image is taged as {{PD-self}} but is clearly a scan of a book page. --66.95.123.6 (talk) 16:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Haifa.jpg

Image:Haifa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aprodigy9 (notify | contribs).

Not in use, can't see potential reason to use it in any article, name not representative, low quality Ynhockey ^(Talk) 18:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons showing through. 20:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Shauna Danielle (fishnet).jpg

Image:Shauna Danielle (fishnet).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stoneworx7 (notify | contribs).

This is more an advert than anything, or an article. Cheers, Jonomacdrones _(talk) 18:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2.2.08_Spikeball_Logo.jpg

Image:2.2.08_Spikeball_Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chrisruder (notify | contribs).

Not used, probably not ensyclopedic, as far as I can tell we have no article about this Spikeball organization. Sherool (talk) 20:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AFF.jpg

Image:AFF.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Redscar13 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nilf anion (talk) 22:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The image has been uploaded for the heck of it, Wikipedia is not an image hosting site. Jammy (talk) 10:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  With images labelled as free on commons, that are at least freer (whatever copyright/trademark/et cetera exists on the design, this image is additionally encumbered by the photographer's copyright), there's no basis for retaining this image. WilyD 18:02, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dalek.jpg

Image:Dalek.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alan-WK (notify | contribs).

Image is currently being falsely used under Fair Use - there are at least 8 free images in the Commons here of Daleks to choose from. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 00:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Presuming the images on the commons are genuinely free, and haven't been uploaded in error, then exterminate, replaceable. PhilKnight (talk) 01:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep images on Commons should be deleted because Daleks are still copyrighted characters. Alientraveller (talk) 09:51, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So far as I know, taking a photograph of a copyrighted object is the copyright of the photographer, not the copyright holder of the object. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 10:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is some explanation here.--PhilKnight (talk) 12:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep BBC don't care if people use their images. And this image is the only image of the updated Dalek as all the others are old versions of the Dalek. Jammy (talk) 10:38, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Jammy. —TreasuryTag—t—c 10:44, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.