Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Marie-Aimée Roger-Miclos

Marie-Aimée Roger-Miclos[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2019 at 11:13:39 (UTC)

Reason: It's a fine photograph of a notable woman.
Articles in which this image appears: Marie-Aimée Roger-Miclos
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Jean Reutlinger, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.4% of all FPs} 11:13, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Yann (talk) 11:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, would prefer this to be face on. MER-C 17:47, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @MER-C: I'm not sure you would. We have examples of it by the same photographer, but I don't think they look as good. File:Btv1b85969082-p022_-_Roger-Miclos_C.jpg It's kind of German-Expressionisst-film-looking. Perhaps image Ç (not C: Ç) would be okay. But this is my favourite. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.4% of all FPs} 17:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Brandmeister^talk 22:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support – but prefer more of the original tone. Also I prefer this: File:Btv1b85969082-p022_-_Roger-Miclos_C.jpg and I think it belongs in her article, it shows all of her face. Bammesk (talk) 01:59, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Bammesk: Er, I'm pretty sure I didn't change the tones. At all. It does look like the source file on Commons may not have been the true original, though. I've fixed that. I'll have a poke at C as well, but I'm not sure about that light patch at the top. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.4% of all FPs} 05:33, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fix and the restoration. I would support a delist and replace if C is nominated, but I don't think the article supports two FPs. Bammesk (talk) 00:26, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Adam, about the light patch at the top, it has no material significance, I think it's Ok to modify it, and also Ok to leave it be. Bammesk (talk) 15:37, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could you mark it on the image notes at commons? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.5% of all FPs} 16:43, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About the "light patch at the top", I was referring to what you said in this edit, in other words the bright background at the very top of this image (approximately the top 200 pixels). Bammesk (talk) 17:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Supportive comment as article creator: I'd mention that the side view gives a good look at Roger-Miclos' hairstyle and the interesting shoulder detail of her gown. She was a model for at least one art medal (as mentioned in the article), so the profile was a characteristic pose for her. - Penny Richards (talk) 23:18, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Penny Richards: are you placing a "Support" vote? If yes, please be specific and change your wording above to "Support" rather than "Supportive". Bammesk (talk) 00:53, 3 April 2019 (UTC) . . . Sidenote: FYI, everyone can vote on featured picture nominations, image creators, article creator, etc. Also, per instructions at the top of this page, nominations need a minimum of 5 votes, so your vote, or lack of, can change the outcome of this nomination.[reply]

(In the interests of openness, I did mention to Penny this existed, since she did make the article, when discussing the below FPC for Paulette del Baye, another article she made.) Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.5% of all FPs} 01:37, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 01:38, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Marie-Aimée Roger-Miclos - Photograph A from the Album Reutlinger de portraits divers, vol. 21.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:14, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]