Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Laura Clay
Laura Clay[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2024 at 02:38:17 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality image used as lead. High resolution, high EV.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Laura Clay, Gerhard Sisters
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Others
- Creator
- Gerhard Sisters, restored by FatCat96
- Support as nominator – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 02:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Oppose– Watermark. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)- That's just th artist's signature. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 11:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- I left the watermark to add EV to Gerhard Sisters. If you want me to upload an alt without the watermark, I will. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 13:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support in that (per Adam) case. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Though I'd suggest using the brush tool set to hue in order to fix some colour deviations. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 18:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - serious damage/artifacts around the face, visible posterisation/JPEG artifacts towards the bottom. MER-C 19:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- User:MER-C, I fixed the area next to her face (next to her chin), and I restored the pixel level integrity of the nom version to that of the original scan from the source (University of Kentucky). Now the restored (nominated) image differs from the original only in the retouched areas. It's as good as it gets (given the original). User:FatCat96, I took the liberty of taking (and using) your restored version and uploading an updated version on top. I hope you don't mind. Thank you for your restorations and nominations. Bammesk (talk) 01:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'll remain in the oppose column. That removed the artifacts around the face but the face and neck has the same problem. MER-C 11:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- That's on the original itself. It looks very much like brushwork to add texture to her skin. Not defects. That’s not something we restore or remove, unless there was a good reason for it. Bammesk (talk) 02:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- It's generally signs of image editing that aged poorly Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 02:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Victorian image editing. Like, physical edits to the negative. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 05:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- It's generally signs of image editing that aged poorly Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 02:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- That's on the original itself. It looks very much like brushwork to add texture to her skin. Not defects. That’s not something we restore or remove, unless there was a good reason for it. Bammesk (talk) 02:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'll remain in the oppose column. That removed the artifacts around the face but the face and neck has the same problem. MER-C 11:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- User:MER-C, I fixed the area next to her face (next to her chin), and I restored the pixel level integrity of the nom version to that of the original scan from the source (University of Kentucky). Now the restored (nominated) image differs from the original only in the retouched areas. It's as good as it gets (given the original). User:FatCat96, I took the liberty of taking (and using) your restored version and uploading an updated version on top. I hope you don't mind. Thank you for your restorations and nominations. Bammesk (talk) 01:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Laura Clay by the Gerhard Sisters, 1916.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 07:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Added image to People/Political instead. Armbrust The Homunculus 07:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)