Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Hyangwonjeong

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hyangwonjeong Pavilion. Gyeongbokgung Palace, Seoul KOREA[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2011 at 15:29:36 (UTC)

Original - Hyangwonjeong (Hangul: 향원정; Hanja: 香遠亭), or Hyangwonjeong Pavilion, is a small, two-story hexagonal pavilion built around 1873 by the order of King Gojong when Geoncheonggung residence was built to the north of the Hyangwonjeong site within Gyeongbokgung.
Reason
;Articles in which this image appears:Gyeongbokgung
FP category for this image
???
Creator
WPPilot --WPPilot 15:31, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as nominator --WPPilot 15:29, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Support! Thank god, I couldn't oppose another photo of yours! The composition is great, the quality isn't fantastic, but good enough! Aaadddaaammm (talk) 20:11, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Could it be possible to see an alt with the left bottom corner chopped off? Nergaal (talk) 21:49, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'd rather see the stones cloned out, shouldn't be that hard, instead of cropping, also I think the white-balance needs edited it a bit, colors seem a bit warm. — raekyt 21:33, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support. Good photo. The exposure is a little dark, but I definitely do not think the white balance is too warm (a bit cool and green, actually). -- King of ♠ 05:56, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support I'm not liking the darkness on the right side. A small part of the picture is completely black. Still, the eye is drawn toward the center of the picture, so I suppose it's not overbearing.--Nanoman657 (talk) 19:48, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose a featured and excellent photograph? No! Poor white balance, very bad lighting (at the right it's heavily underexposed, and in the middle the white parts of the image are overexposed and blown out), dust spots as far as the eye can see and the picture is distorted. Image quality is otherwise ok (some CA and it's a bit grainy, but shaprness is good) and against the composition I can't say something bad, too. But sorry, that's really not a featured shot. --kaʁstn 14:46, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 19:17, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]