Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Graptopsaltria nigrofuscata

Graptopsaltria nigrofuscata[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Feb 2022 at 08:12:19 (UTC)

Reason: High EV and good quality
Articles in which this image appears: Graptopsaltria nigrofuscata
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: 池田正樹

Support as nominator – Tomer T (talk) 08:12, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. This is a stub article but a stub article is no barrier to an image becoming FP. See discussion on stub articles. For little-known species, a good image is crucial. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:25, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Less than 100 words of text, or less than a third of a stub. All FP noms are de facto nominations for TFP; this one fails to meet Main Page standards. – Sca (talk) 13:33, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is no basis for an oppose Sca. Following the previous disussions about stub articles, your vote could be interpreted as disruptive. Can we have other views please? @Adam Cuerden, Rhododendrites, Tomer T, MER-C, Janke, Armbrust, TheFreeWorld, Mydreamsparrow, Andrew J.Kurbiko, Bammesk, Vulphere, and Buidhe: Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:44, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All been said before. – Sca (talk) 15:53, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that POTD issues should be consider separately to FP issues. Articles can improve seperately, and whilst this night be blocked from POTD until the article improves, it also allows for a far better focus on the article if the article is short which can be beneficial.I

However, we've created a worse problem now: having a discussion where you pull people to the FPC page who haven't yet voted on it kind of feels a little too close to canvassing for votes by the people this linked to count. I don't think there's any ill intent, but it's hard to see how to move forwards from this short of restarting the nomination. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 16:58, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not canvassing for this nom - it's not mine! Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:09, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No accusation intended; just feel like I shouldn't vote in it now, y'know? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 01:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support. MER-C 16:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:48, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]