Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Antoine de Favray - The Mirabita Sisters - Google Art Project.jpg
The Mirabita Sisters by Antoine de Favray (1754/1764)[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2015 at 15:33:40 (UTC)
- Reason
- HQ + EV
- Articles in which this image appears
- Antoine de Favray
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
- Creator
- Antoine de Favray
- Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 15:33, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Very nice. HullIntegrity\ talk / 15:38, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose - If you're nominating an image to represent the artist, please choose one which is the most representative. The greater the number of articles nominated/featured, the less EV each individual image has. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:49, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Where did you find this rule? please show me and link it. Paintings and photos evaluate here individually not for each painter just one work! Alborzagros (talk) 15:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- You are nominating several paintings by the same artist which do not have EV in and of themselves, but as representations of the artist's style. One painting is sufficient for that. WP:FP? requires an image to "Add significant encyclopedic value to an article and helps readers to understand an article."; "significant" is negated when there are multiple images showing much the same thing. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Please show me rule in [1] and type or highlight where is written. Alborzagros (talk) 06:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- I've already quoted the rule. If you are unable to accept that, that's not my problem. Down below, J. Milburn has already explained my position as well. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:56, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks I didn't mention the text in quotation mark (above) is from WP:FP. I thought that is your words. any way ... This painting Adds significant encyclopedic value to article, Antoine de Favray (painter) and helps readers to understand that article. HOW? Blow the painting in the article we can see this words:«The Mirabita Sisters, Museum of Fine Arts, Houston.» then now we can find out that:
- One of Antoine de Favray's painting is about Mirabita Sisters.
- The painting is drawn in 1754/1764.
- It has been maintained in Museum of Fine Arts, Houston. So reply my question:
- Don't three items above add significant encyclopedic value to painter's article?
- Don't three items above help readers to understand painter's article?
- Alborzagros (talk) 11:16, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- You are clearly not reading my comments. The paintings may individually have the EV necessary. Nominating all three negates that EV, as it says "Look, there are other images that work just as well." ("So why should this one be featured?" we ask) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:25, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Sadly can't find much info on it. Love this painting. [2][3] Maybe it should be nominated on commons instead where they don't ask for to be used. Hafspajen (talk) 22:23, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Maybe the sisters are notable? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:49, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 15:34, 26 March 2015 (UTC)