Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Most Played Juke Box Folk Records number ones of 1946/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Most Played Juke Box Folk Records number ones of 1946[edit]

Featured list candidates/List of Most Played Juke Box Folk Records number ones of 1946/archive1

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:55, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry everyone, it's yet another country music number ones list. So far 55 of these have been successfully promoted to FL, so I next present the list for 1946, when notably the chart methodology of the time allowed no fewer than four songs to tie for the number-one spot in one week..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:55, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Harrias[edit]

NB: I am competing in the WikiCup and might claim points for this review.

Table query: why do you merge cells for the Title, Artist(s) and Ref. columns, but not the Issue date?
Consider using {{Abbr|Ref.|Reference}} to produce Ref. in place of just "Ref." in the header row.
File:Bob Wills Texas Playboys Publicity Photo - Cropped.jpg The license claims that "it was published in the United States between 1925 and 1977", but the date listed in the information is 2013. This needs to be corrected so that we can demonstrate that the license is appropriate.
Other images seem fine to me.
"..the "King of Western swing"." According to who? If this was a common moniker, maybe just rephrase to something like "..who was widely know as the "King of Western swing"."

That's it from me. There's a few "would this" and "would that"s I would changed to a straight past tense, but nothing major. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 16:15, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Harrias: - all addressed, hopefully to your satisfaction. I ultimately decided to swap the lead image for a different one..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:09, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NB when I merged the rows for the dates it caused some of the song/artist/ref rows to disappear (Dick Thomas against February 2 was one) and I couldn't for the life of me figure out what the issue was, so I wound up going with a sort of halfway house...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:16, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support, nice work: prose is of good quality, the list meets ACCESS requirements, all the stuff I'd expect from a FL pro. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 19:37, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Can't find anything, nice work! ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:23, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nothing I could pick up on. I look forward to the day when I can support your nomination for this massive featured topic. (= ~ HAL333([2]) 22:51, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your kind words, HAL333. The only issue I can see with a potential FT is the "cap stone" article. I can't see how List of Billboard number-one country hits could be expanded to FL status...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oh well... ~ HAL333([3]) 16:12, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - HAL333 - it might be possible, I've had a germ of an idea today...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      - Fingers crossed (; ~ HAL333([4]) 16:41, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        I think it should be possible. But if not, remember that WP:WIAFT #3(c) says that: "Items that are ineligible for featured article, featured list or good article status, either due to their limited subject matter (in the case of lists only) or due to inherent instability (in the case of either articles or lists), must have passed an individual quality audit that included a completed peer review, with all important problems fixed. Such items do not count towards criteria 1(a), 3(a)(ii), or 3(b)(i)." Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 17:03, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source review - Pass[edit]

Pass – I updated the ISBN 10s to 13. Consistent formatting and reliability, good work as always Aza24 (talk) 01:52, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:32, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.