Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Louisiana Purchase Sesquicentennial half dollar/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted by Laser brain via FACBot (talk) 24 July 2019 [1].


Louisiana Purchase Sesquicentennial half dollar[edit]

Nominator(s): Wehwalt (talk) 23:03, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about... a coin that never was, one of seven commemoratives to be vetoed by presidents. This one is interesting not only for a distant relationship to the Kennedy assassination through Clay Shaw, but because it was pushed by Eric P. Newman, long lived and giving numismatist and author who left money to help preserve numismatic knowledge at a time when coin collecting is not as popular as it once was.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:03, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support – I can manage precisely one quibble: I think, but am not quite sure enough to change it myself, that in "Ryan mentioned a observance" the "a" should be "an". Happy to support. Clear, pithy, as well illustrated as I imagine is possible, and well and widely referenced. Tim riley talk 14:13, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review and support.--Wehwalt (talk) 00:14, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image review: All three images are appropriately licensed and captioned. Moisejp (talk) 02:31, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that.--Wehwalt (talk) 00:14, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sources review[edit]

  • No spotchecks carried out
  • All external links to sources are working per the checker tool
  • No format issues
  • Accessibility: Ref 22 – can you advise how this page can be accessed? The link goes to a search page; how to proceed from there?
  • Otherwise the sources appear to meet the all required criteria for ·quality and reliability

Brianboulton (talk) 10:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that. I am investigating why the links don't work on @22.--Wehwalt (talk) 00:14, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the delay. I"ve gone another route on that link. Hopefully this will work. That should be everything. Thank you for the review.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:41, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support – I see no problems with this at all. It is excellently written, well-illustrated, and comprehensively sourced. CassiantoTalk 08:00, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review and support.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:41, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.