Wikipedia:Editor review/kopf1988 (2)

Kopf1988

Kopf1988 (talk · contribs) I have been editing Wikipedia for a while now, and may someday request Administrator-ship. How am I doing overall so far? Kopf1988 17:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Reviews

• You seem to be off to a pretty good start. Your edit count is a bit low to be considering adminship, but it's a good thing to keep your eyes on the future. You have a lot of user space and talk space edits, but that isn't necessarily a bad thing, especially since you seem to be doing a decent job of editing in lots of different ways - templates, article mainspaces, and Wikipedia project pages. It is also very good to learn from deleted articles. Your edit summaries are informative, and your edits seem to be done in the utmost of good faith. I say, keep up the good work! Verkhovensky 17:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

• View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   Of all my contributions to Wikipedia, I could barely pick out a mere handle that I am particular pleased with. I am glad to have worked with others on the RPG Maker series articles, as I added as much information as I could. More recently, I have done a lot of work on the various anime conventions all of which have some great material out there to use that just needs found and brought to Wikipedia. I suppose I would say I am particularly please with my edits to Another Anime Convention (hopefully it doesn't get deleted), and to AnimeIowa. Others I'm glad to have helped with include JRuby and RPG Maker both of which needed the attention of someone knowledgeable in the fields.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   Most recently I have created and done a lot of work to the article about Another Anime Convention, and found out that the article had been deleted before for lack of notability. Of course seeing one's work come close to deletion would cause nearly anyone stress, I'm glad for the experience, as it only caused me to work harder on the article to prevent it's deletion. Since its nomination for deletion I have added a few references, and participated heavily in the deletion discussion. In the future if I ever encounter such problems again, it will only continue to push me to work harder.