- Tatyana N. Mickushina (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)
I submit for your consideration an application for revision of the deletion of the article "Tatyana N. Mickushina.” The main reason for the deletion is indicated as "Does not appear to have been the subject of significant independent coverage." I researched this topic and I managed to find a significant number of authoritative independent sources. Some of them relate to the "basic criteria", some to the "additional criteria - author.” I also added information about the fairly wide distribution of books by Tatyana Mikushina.
I created new article. This article is available at sandbox.
I. basic criteria:
Various sources have been found:
- analytical, devoted exclusively to the activities of T. Mickushina as a writer and public figure (Russian Bulletin, Book Industry)
- analytical, in which a separate section or part of the article is devoted to it (Ukrin-form, Novye Izvestiya)
- discussion articles (Russian People's Line, Regions of Russia)
- news articles about the release of her book about the award for writing (Network of city portals, All-Russian Business rating)
- mention of her writing activity in the book of Dr. Hans Martin Krämer "Theosophy across Boundaries: Transcultural and Interdisciplinary Perspectives on a Modern Esoteric Movement”
II. additional criteria - author - 4с - The person's work (or works) has won significant critical attention:
There are reviews and analysis of her books by several scientists from around the world (Russia, Ukraine, Germany, Portugal.) Also a review by the President of the London Theosophical Society.
III. T. Mickushina's books are quite widespread in the world. They are represented in the largest libraries of several countries of the world (USA, Russia, Ukraine, Portugal, Germany, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Belarus), as well as in well-known bibliographic databases (on the sites of Goodreads, Library Thing, Open Library, LiveLib, aNobii, Readgeek.)
Below are links to sources. Most of them are Russian-speaking. Therefore, for the convenience of evaluation, I give a description of these links.
I. Basic criteria:
1 — Ukrainian National News Agency "Ukrinform" - in the article there is a section called "Riga: Matilda plus Volyn", which is dedicated to the action initiated by T. Mickushina "Stop Matilda.”
2 — dr. Hans Martin Krämer, Heidelberg University – the book "Theosophy across Boundaries: Transcultural and Interdisciplinary Perspectives on a Modern Esoteric Movement", section "Effects of Theosophy on Russian Cultural History" – about the writing activity of T. Mickushina.
3 — The newspaper "Russian Bulletin" - Doctor of Sociological Sciences I.A.Romanov (at that time a leading researcher at the "Russian Institute for Strategic Studies") – criticism of the activities of T. Mickushina.
4 — The All-Russian Business Rating company in 2018 awarded T. Mickushina for publishing and contribution to the spiritual revival of the country.
5 — Network of information portals "Network of city portals", Omsk regional depart-ment "ngs55.ru " – about the release and presentation at the All-Russian book fair of one of T. Mickushina's books.
6 — The newspaper "Novye Izvestia" – a mention of the writing activity of T. Mickushina in the context of a discussion of the concept developed by her called "The National Idea of Russia.”
7 — Information and analytical service "Russian People's Line" - discussion about the system of views of T. Mickushina and her activities.
8 — The journal "Regions of Russia" - legal assessment of the controversy surrounding the activities of T. Mickushina.
The magazine "Book Industry" No. 4-5, 2017 – an article dedicated to the writing activity of T. Mickushina and the 10th anniversary of the “Sirius” publishing house created by her (the full electronic version of the magazine is not publicly available.) Below are links to the review of the article on the official website and a screenshot of the page with the article:
9 — Review of an article published in the journal "Book Industry" (official website.)
10 — Screenshot of the full version of this article (below average quality.)
II. Additional criteria - author - 4c — The person's work (or works) has won significant critical attention:
11 — PhD, senior researcher scientist, Y.Y. Zavhorodnii, Institute of philosophy of G. Skovorody, National academy of sciences of Ukraine – review on the book «About yoga and meditation.»
12 — PD Dr. Phil., Bjorn Seidel-Dreffke, Martin Luther University – feedback on the book “Good and Evil: An individual interpretation of The Secret Doctrine by Helena P. Blavatsky“.
13 — Candidate of Philosophy, D. Metilka, NOVA University Lisbon, article on T. Mickushina's book "On non-violence.”
14 — Candidate of Historical Sciences O.L.Soloviev, Ural Federal University – review of the book "The Royal Family. Return.”
15 — Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences M.L.Skuratovskaya, Don State Technical University (magazine "Enlightenment" No.11, 2018, p. 571) – review of the book series "The Words of Wisdom.”
16 — "Esoterica" year 2011., volume 1 (winter-spring) page 37, Journal of the Theosophical Society in London - review by the President of The Theosophical Society in England, Eric McGough on the book "Good and Evil: An individual interpretation of The Secret Doctrine by Helena P. Blavatsky.”
III.
Library databases:
USA — Library of Congress (2 books), Boston Public Library (4 books), San Francisco Public Library (2 books), Harvard Library (3 books), Stanford University Libraries (2 books (1+1)), New York Public Library (1 book), Columbia University Libraries (3 books), University Library at the University of Illinois (1 book)
Russia — Russian State Library (97 books, some of them in foreign languages, also some are repeated), National Library of Russia (66 books)
Ukraine — Yaroslav Mudryi National Library of Ukraine (1 book), Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine (10 books (4 request "Мікушина" + 6 request "Микушина")), Stefanyk National Science Library (8 books), Odessa National Scientific Library (6 books (4+2))
Portugal — National Library of Portugal (5 books)
Germany — German National Library (2 books)
Bulgaria — SS. Cyril and Methodius National Library (14 books)
Czech Republic — National Library of the Czech Republic (6 books (request "Mikušina"))
Belarus — National Library of Belarus (12 books)
Literary databases — Goodreads (67 books), LibraryThing (24 books), Open Library (6 books), LiveLib (162 books, including electronic editions and audio books), aNobii (21 books), Readgeek (9 books) Pisnyy Mykola (talk) 06:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse original delete closure if this is an appeal. Robert McClenon (talk) 09:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Approve Review of Draft or Approve Re-Creation of Article, subject to AFD Robert McClenon (talk) 09:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments - This request is too long, and the appellant has provided an entire day's proceedings at AFD, but this is a straightforward case of submitting a better article than the one that was deleted. Robert McClenon (talk) 09:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Allow recreation though I recommend the appellant become familiar with WP:TLDR for future requests. There seems to be adequate sourcing available. This page is not creation-protected, DRV is not required, but we are here anyway and I will offer my opinion. Appelant can either start a new page from scratch or request the old version at WP:REFUND and buiold upon it. Either way, a new page may be subject to its own AFD. Frank Anchor 15:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Robert McClenon and Frank Anchor, thank you for your answers. Would it be ok, if I publish a new article right now or should I wait for the completion of the application and receiving specific instructions from you in the final result? Pisnyy Mykola (talk) 06:20, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Absent any previous inappropriate re-creation, which we often see with fan-driven articles for internet celebrities, there's no reason to NOT draft a better article and mainspace it when ready. If you want the deleted content and don't have it, I'm sure one of the admins who frequents this discussion board will be happy to help you. But basically, per the above: a "normal" deletion for notability is always subject to someone writing a better article with great sourcing. Jclemens (talk) 08:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse original close as correct. Allow recreation, preferably through AfC. --Enos733 (talk) 17:16, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse, allow recreation. AfD close was obviously correct, but seems to be notable, however please give WP:TLDR a read. {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 02:53, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
|
