Fondazione Child – Withdrawn by nominator. (I'm involved and am boldly closing - if anyone has any problems with this, please immediately revert me.) (non-admin closure) SportingFlyerT·C 19:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Endorse I'm not a fan at all of the closer not using the NAC template when closing this AfD, but the close was completely obvious. SportingFlyerT·C 18:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Meh arguably this should have been nc given the poor standard of the keep arguments and was a factually incorrect close as someone had objected to the article. There was no way this was closing as delete so it doesn’t really matter either way. Renom in 6m if it doesn´t get better SpartazHumbug! 19:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
IMO this afd could have been relisted or closed as no consensus. If relisted there could have been more policy based arguments on either side and there would have been a better discussion to interpret consensus for. If it was closed as no consensus someone could have renominated this for afd by now. I guess for procedural sake this delrev wouldn't make any difference, and I could have just renominated (ignoring the 6m recommended period) and provide a rationale for why the fate of the article should be reconsidered. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 19:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It had already been double relisted at this point without any clear appetite for discussion. Just renominate in a few months. SportingFlyerT·C 19:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. I'd like to withdraw this. Can someone with knowledge on how this is closed close this as speedy endorse? Thanks. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 19:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
