Third Single – Speedy restore as closer has acknowledged the procedural error and consensus is clear. Any interested editor can take it to XfD StarMississippi 01:53, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Out of process CSD as the redirect is too old, admin Anthony Bradbury has seen my message at his talk page and chose to do nothing. Lightoil (talk) 21:11, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Overturn. WP:CSD#R3 only applies to recently created redirects. Third Single had existed since November 2013. ✗plicit 01:55, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And it was created by a page move, which R3 also excludes. The page had been there since November 2010. —Cryptic 03:04, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Overturn per above comments.—Alalch E. 07:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, our job is to see the deletion process is correctly followed so the "overturn" votes are understandable, but why oh why should Third Single redirect to some K-Pop album from 2006? If process requires an overturn, then we should list immediately at RFD.—S MarshallT/C 08:45, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I concede my procural error; but it seems to me to be beyond question that this redirect should not be here. If my deletion is wrong, I would appreciate alternative suggestions. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
At the time, K-pop single albums were inconsistently referred to as various titles, like Third Single, Third Single Album3rd SingleBIGBANG (Third Single Album). It was not uncommon to simply be referred to releases by their chronological order [1]. The speedy deletion should have been declined and RFD should have been the natural next step. ✗plicit 01:39, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Overturn and Restore, as discussed. Being a stupid redirect isn't one of the reasons for speedy deletion. Send it to RFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:26, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This shouldn't have been speedily deleted, but I don't see anybody here arguing that the redirect should exist. Overturning and listing at RfD doesn't make sense unless there is a genuine debate about the existence of the redirect, otherwise it's process for the sake of process. Hut 8.5 11:01, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would propose a speedy restore and send to MfD immediately rather than leaving this open. Those advocating WP:NOTBURO takes on what is almost certainly going to be deleted at MfD have a point... but if we're going to have to leave this open for any length of time, let's end this process, send to MfD, and have almost the same overall time with an incontestable outcome. Jclemens (talk) 23:29, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
