This incident involved Mike Pence when he was campaigning for the Donald Trump Campaign. Considering the success of the Trump campaign, this probably qualifies as notable now. Joseph Zadeh (talk) 08:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The argument for deletion was that the subject was a briefly significant news story with no lasting importance or coverage. How does Trump winning the election change that? Has the event acquired new importance, or is it getting continuing coverage now? Unless one of those is the case I don't see any need to revisit this. Hut 8.5 13:12, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse nothing about the election outcome changes the concerns raised at AfD. Pence being VP-elect doesn't have an impact here. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse, clear decision, although I personally would have !voted for a redirect to Mike_Pence#2016_vice_presidential_campaign. There is currently some coverage there, and it can be expanded by consensus, with discussions to occur at Talk:Mike_Pence. It should be included at Engineered_materials_arrestor_system#Incidents, with technical information in that article. The status quo appears reasonable, but expansion can be discussed on the article talk pages. There is no case to make for overturning the AfD, or for supporting a stand alone article. --SmokeyJoe (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@SmokeyJoe: did you mean to comment on the below DRV about the aircraft incident? Hut 8.5 08:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
yes, thanks. Hut 8.5. I cut and pasted this thread from above to here. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse, I'm not really sure I grasp why the results of the election would overturn an AFD. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:02, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
