Mike Ciesnolevicz – Endorsed but the article can be userfied on request. I haven't gone ahead to do this as the nominator doesn' have an account so has no userspace for me to place this into, – SpartazHumbug! 05:52, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
I am requesting a deletion review. I have recently noticed my wikipedia page has been deleted after having one for roughly 6-7 years. I am not sure how this happened as i was told you need at least 3 "notable" fights to keep your page. I have fought on TV 12x, Spike TV, Fox Sports Net, My Network TV, HDNET and TSN in Canada. I am a 9x International Fight League veteran as well as 2x world champion and a 2x UFC veteran. My current website is MikeCMMA.com. I can be found on google quite easily as well as in many feature books such as "A Fighters Mind" & "Blood in the Cage." Many of my former fights are on youtube. I can be found on sherdog.com as an established veteran MMA fighter of over 10 years. I have a teaching degree from Lock Haven Univeristy where i was a member of the boxing and wrestling teams. I hold 4 blackbelts in martial arts and have trained all over the globe from Thailand to Brazil to my current home in Las Vegas.
Thank you,
Michael D. Ciesnolevicz
mikecmma.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.173.218.206 (talk) 21:11, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Michael for this request. It is quite a reasonable request. Can an admin please temporarily undelete the article for the purpose of the review? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:49, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
temporarily restored for discussion at Deletion Review DGG ( talk ) 17:21, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy on Request There was a "per nom" !vote, which carried no weight, so WP:NOQUORUM is the result of the AfD. I see large sections of unsourced content that would need to be removed if the sourcing can be found to satisfy notability. Unscintillating (talk) 04:36, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse but Userfy. Closure was reasonable given what the closing admin had to work with (which wasn't much). However, the article isn't so terrible that it can't be moved into userspace or draftspace to have additional sourcing to verify the claims made by the subject. Lankiveil(speak to me) 04:06, 28 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Endorse and userfy - I don't find issue with the close but I also find the request for userfication to be very reasonable. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 16:08, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse and userfy If the claims made are valid, it seems only fair to grant the request for userfication to go forward so that sources can be provided. Dramamoose (talk) 21:28, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
