Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2014 August 21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

21 August 2014[edit]

  • DoodleblueSpeedy close, due to no rationale being offered. Any user is welcome to relist provided they provide a reason the deletion should be reviewed. – Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:13, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Doodleblue (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)

A7,G11,G12 Doodleblueofficial (talk) 01:03, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - it's been deleted five times and salted twice. You're going to need to convince people here that you have a viable draft that meets Wikipedia criteria before that title is going to be unprotected. I would start with WP:N, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:MOS and (given your username) WP:COI. Stlwart111 04:50, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Endorse by default since no reason has been given to explain why the deletion criteria didn't apply. --86.2.216.5 (talk) 12:23, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Endorse literally no rationale given. Should probably be speedy-closed (as an AFD with no given rationale would be). Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:58, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.