Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 February 13

Chris Mavinga – Unsalted and moved by Stwalkerster. This DRV is now moot. – lifebaka++ 01:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

Player now passes WP:ATHLETE notability and guidelines. The admin who locked the page has sadly retired. Joao10Siamun (talk) 00:12, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

Shlomo Shamai – Uncontroversial unprotection granted. – lifebaka++ 14:56, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

Deleted by User:PMDrive1061 (no longer active on Wikipedia) as non-notable and possible COI. Has just won the prestigious IEEE Claude E. Shannon Award. All the other winners have Wiki pages. (PS I am not related to subject in any way and do not know him.) Udzu (talk) 09:59, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

moot, just create it even without this award, clearly meets WP:PROF as an IEEE fellow and Member of the Board of Governors of the Information Theory Society [1]. Throw in his H-index of 34 [2] and there is no way any such article would meet A7. The Shannon award (which is _huge_ in the field) puts it way over the top. If you want the old version of the article, just ask any passing admin to userfy it for you. Heck WP:REFUND is probably the fastest way forward here if you want the old version back. Hobit (talk) 10:19, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it's create protected at the moment... --82.7.40.7 (talk) 11:17, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Missed that. In any case, this is a no brainer and should be unprotected and created ASAP. Hobit (talk) 12:47, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

Scott Walterschied – endorse deletion, copyvios are not allowed – Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 18:34, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

Copyright violation removed by Cunard

Sources: New York Times (USA) 22 April 2009, Vol. Media, Iss. Sunday, pg. 3, by: Lorne Manly, "Decline in Movie Finance"

Variety.com (USA) 28 January 2011, by: Eric Kohn, "Walterschied Eying WME Comic Exodus"

The Times (UK) 15 December 2010, Vol. Sunday, Iss. Arts, pg. 1, by: Giles Coren, "2011 London Comic Expo"

Indy Film (USA) 16 April 2010, Vol. 520, pg. Cover, by: Staff, "Film Financing"

OTF Exchange (USA) 16 April 2010, Vol. 5010, Iss. April, pg. 1, by: Staff, "Film Finance Panel & Reception" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcgawkelly (talk • contribs) 23:33, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have removed a copyright violation from this DRV and Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 5, and tagged User:Mcgawkelly, User:Mcgawkelly/new article name here, and User talk:Mcgawkelly/new article name here as copyright violations. Cunard (talk) 08:32, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Given that this was deleted for copyright violation concerns, I see no reason that we should unsalt the article right now. Anyone can feel free to draw up a non-copyvio draft, of course, and have it moved into mainspace. Cheers. lifebaka++ 01:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep deleted, concur with lifebaka that the best way forward is to produce a non-violating userspace draft. Stifle (talk) 09:22, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

13 February 2011[edit]