Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Archive/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

May - July 2009

  • Proposal: Should we move the edit button for sections?
  • RFC: What should be done with non-notable bilateral relations articles that have been merged?
  • Discussion: Shall a bot add dated subcategories of category:articles lacking sources to unreferenced articles?
  • RFC: Shall a bot "fix" heading levels?
  • RFC: How to categorize articles that have categories named after them?
  • RFC: Is there a consensus on how notability applies to fictional topics?
  • RFC: Should {{Unreferenced}} employ "unverifiable" or "unverified" in its WP:BURDEN invoking language?
  • Poll: Should WP:NOT#PLOT be reworded, moved, removed, or kept the same?
  • RFC: What is the community's view of paid editing?
  • RFC: What are the opinions on using {{Italictitle}} to italicise certain articles' titles?
  • Discussion: Should notability criteria for pornographic actors be rolled back?
  • RFC. Outside opinions are needed on self electing groups.
  • RFC: Proposed articles that would not be delinked by the date unlinking bot.

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

  • Discussion: Should we give guidance on the lengths of lead sections?
  • Proposal: Add a link to Wikinews articles in template {{Recent death}}.
  • Discussion: To what extent shall non-free text be permissible in userspace?
  • Discussion: Should administrators be permitted to impose discretionary sanctions (page/topic bans, revert restrictions, interaction bans, etc.) without prior community consensus or arbitration remedy?
  • Proposal to increase the default size of thumbnail images from 180px.
  • Proposal (software change): Turning autoconfirmed into an explicit usergroup granted automatically
  • Proposal to require new accounts which are not yet autoconfirmed to go through the Article Wizard 2.0 to create new articles
  • Proposal to create a bot to process the backlog of unreferenced BLPs and notify creators the article is unreferenced.
  • A draft revamp of WP:Requests for comment/User conduct for which input is needed
  • Proposal (Manual of Style): to disapprove all-numeric dates (like 2009-09-30) in footnotes
  • Discussion : Should a section be added on the main page for "Article to improve"?
  • Discussion if there are problems with how we interact with new users and what can we do?
  • Proposal to enable site messages with option to disable and no message bar by default.

November 2009

December 2009