Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 16

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< January 15
January 17 >

January 16[edit]

Category:Fictional characters involved in incest[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 24#Category:Fictional characters involved in incest

Category:Public domain characters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category was previously deleted year ago in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 October 14#Category:Public domain characters. Part of one argument is that this content should be listified rather than having a separate category for what could be a huge category. Since it was deleted before, I thought I'd bring it back to CFD to see if this decision should be overturned or carried out as a CSD G4-type of deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Partial satellite launch failures[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 24#Category:Partial satellite launch failures

Category:Hồ Văn Trung[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unhelpful for navigation to have a page and a single category (which also only has one page) Mason (talk) 21:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Israeli social commentators[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: broaden the category because there isn't a "social commentators" parent category Mason (talk) 21:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. "Social" is also too subjective. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Financial commentators by nationality[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 24#Category:Financial commentators by nationality

Category:Artists from the Province of Canada[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Province of Canada people. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining intersection between "pre-Confederation Canada" era and occupation. Mason (talk) 21:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Bowling stubs[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No template, unproposed, unnecessary, as are the following sub-cats, none of which contain more than 1 article. Her Pegship (?) 20:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional characters by age and medium[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Fictional characters by medium. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Extreme WP:NARROWCAT with only two categories. Leads to clutter, should be dual upmerged. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional characters by owner[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: "Owner" is vague and can mean a lot of things, leading to WP:SURPRISE. If this category is to stay here, it needs a more specific name.

Category:Fictional characters by creator already exists, so the current name is also redundant, as a creator can also be an owner of the character. Company likely makes the most sense. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Countesses of Urgell[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Countesses. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge. No need to distinguish the gender for counts of a region. Mason (talk) 19:36, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Female characters in fairy tales[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No consensus to merge these two categories in isolation, without prejudice against a broader nomination of the entire tree. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:CATDEF. See also companion CfD for males. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:01, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'm relisting mostly so this can be discussed alongside the discussion below.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Procedural keep on gender issue; Keep as sub-category of “Literary characters by genre”. On the first issue, I agree with Zxcvbnm that it’s not appropriate to delete this category based on gender, as a one-off. Need to review all of the literature categories that use gender, for consistency, and treat them all the same. On the fairy-tale issue, I would say that fairy tales are a distinct sub-category of literature, as an aspect of folklore and therefore should remain as a separate sub-category of literature. As the fairy tale article notes: "all these together form the literature of preliterate societies". They are a special type of literature, preceding modern literature, and therefore should have separate sub-categories, for example, within the sub-cat of “Literary characters by genre”. That is an appropriate location for this category. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 13:55, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Male characters in fairy tales[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No consensus to merge these two categories in isolation, without prejudice against a broader nomination of the entire tree. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:CATDEF. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Procedural keep on gender issue; Keep as a literary genre, for same reasons as I gave above for the female category. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 14:07, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:20th-century executions by Singapore[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No consensus. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: It seems that Singapore only executes by hanging per Capital punishment in Singapore. I think that we should either rename this category to reflect that, or rename the parent Category:People executed by Singapore by hanging to just say Category:People executed by Singapore Mason (talk) 21:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would support renaming the parent category to be more broad and future-proof. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:36, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Tagged Category:People executed by Singapore by hanging.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 10:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep; unless Singapore starts using another method of execution, the current names are factually accurate, and match siblings within both international parents Category:People executed by hanging by country and Category:20th-century executions. – Fayenatic London 20:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    They may be accurate, but they're confusing. I spent a good five minutes trying to figure out if the category was incorrectly parented. If no change is made, I think that a very clear explanation in the category would be helpful. Mason (talk) 01:54, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Finnic peoples[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Finno-Ugric peoples while that category exists. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename per Baltic Finnic peoples. Note that Finnic peoples (disambiguation) is merely a dab page primarily linking to Baltic Finnic peoples. Also purge Sámi peoples. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Rocket launches[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only contain 1 entry each. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sociedade Esportiva Palmeiras players[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per Talk:SE Palmeiras#Requested move 21 June 2023. Svartner (talk) 16:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Finno-Ugric peoples[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 24#Category:Finno-Ugric peoples

Category:Religious places of the indigenous peoples of North America[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:INDIGENOUS when describing people the word "Indigenous" should be capitalized. ARoseWolf 15:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, "Indigenous" is capitalized when referring to citizenship (i.e. a proper name) but there is no North American citizenship, this is merely descriptive. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Indigenous people are defined by their citizenship with Native American or Indigenous tribal nations. It is naming convention policy. Lowercase 'indigenous' would be reserved for contexts in which the term does not apply to Indigenous people in any sense—for example, indigenous plant and animal species. If you don't like policy then there are ways to challenge the policy. --ARoseWolf 19:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC) --edited 19:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lawyers from the Province of Canada[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Recently created category, which overlaps with other recently created categories, and is not technically accurate. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 12:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Shortly after the decision to delete the "British North America lawyers" category, and to create sub-categories for "Lawyers in Lower Canada/Canada East" and "Lawyers in Upper Canada/Canada West", John Pack Lambert left a message on my Talk page, suggesting the creation of a new category: "Lawyers from the Province of Canada". He suggested that the divisions of Canada East and Canada West were "just conventional" and the real factor was the Province of Canada. I replied that I did not think the proposed category was needed, in light of the decision to create the two sub-categories, and was not technically accurate. Mr Lambert has now created the category. My reasons on my Talk page for not creating it were:
"Hi John Pack Lambert, I’ve thought about your suggestion but I don’t think it would work. There was no single bar for the Province of Canada, because the legal and court systems were different. Lawyers in Lower Canada / Canada East were members of the Law Society of Lower Canada, trained in the civil law. Lawyers from Upper Canada / Canada West were members of the law Society of Upper Canada, trained in the common law. Neither set of lawyers had right of audience in the courts of the other section. There was clear continuity in the lawyers from Lower Canada / Canada East / Quebec, and a separate continuity in the lawyers from Upper Canada / Canada West / Ontario. That’s why I’ve suggested putting a sub-category of Lower Canada lawyers in the existing category of « Lawyers in Quebec », and a sub-category of Upper Canada lawyers in the existing category of « Lawyers in Ontario ». I would also say that if a lawyer was called to either bar prior to Confederation, but continued into Confederation, they should just be catégorised as a Quebec lawyer or an Ontario lawyer. If they ceased practice before 1867, then I’d put them in the sub-categories."
"The reason I suggest this approach is that the division of the province of Canada into Canada East and Canada West wasn’t just conventional. The Province of Canada was a quasi-federation, and the separate court systems and legal systems, with separate bars, was one of the strongest markers of the quasi-federal nature."
For the same reasons, I suggest that the new category should be deleted. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 13:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Johnpacklambert:, as creator of category; @Bearcat:, @Smasongarrison:, and @Marcocapelle:, as participants in previous discussion. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 13:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am not familiar enough with the history of Canada to comment on this. If I understood correctly, Mr Lambert is not allowed to participate in deletion discussions, but I think an exception should be made here because this case is entirely unrelated to the reason of his topic ban (if that is what it is). User:Fayenatic london what would be good procedure here? Marcocapelle (talk) 18:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think that it is a good idea to temporarily lift the ban. [1] The reason of the ban was because of how they reacted to deletion discussions. Mason (talk) 19:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for asking, but I was not aware of the ban at the time, and although I once tried to look for it to check what was decided, I did not find it. – Fayenatic London 22:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The relevant ban is Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct in deletion-related editing#Johnpacklambert topic banned. An appeal to explicitly allow CfD participation was withdrawn after a tepid reception from arbcom. Although I'm not an arbitrator so have no power over there, I would never have worded the ban to include CfD in the first place, but then I often think conduct sanctions are harsher than they need to be. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. All articles are already present in Category:19th-century Canadian lawyers, so this category is not needed. Perhaps it should be manually merged to Category:Province of Canada people? However, I imagine the articles are already present elsewhere in that tree. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and per precedent.@Johnpacklambert, please listen to other people's wisdom here. There is no need to distinguish Canadian people intersections by occupation and colony. Mason (talk) 19:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • You seem to misunderstand that the remaining categories are even narrower intersections, namely by type of law within the Province of Canada. This is just for info, I do not say it is better or worse. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The previous discussion is here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_January_3#Category:Medical_doctors_from_British_North_America. Based on that discussion, I created two new categories: “Lawyers in Lower Canada/Canada East”, which is a sub-cat of “Lawyers in Quebec”, which in turn is a sub-cat of “Canadian Lawyers”. I also created “Lawyers in Upper Canada/Canada West”, which is a sub-cat of “Lawyers in Ontario”, also a sub-cat of “Canadian Lawyers”. In my opinion, there is an historical / geographic / civil law continuity for the legal profession in Lower Canada/Canada East => Quebec, and an historical / geographic / common law continuity for the legal profession in Upper Canada/Canada West => Ontario, which would be masked by the new category. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 12:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I should also mention that there was continuity in the use of the terms “Lower Canada” and “Upper Canada”, even after the creation of the Province of Canada in 1841, which is why I created “Lawyers in Lower Canada/Canada East” and “Lawyers in Upper Canada/Canada West”. The Parliament of the Province of Canada passed a statute that provided that the terms “Lower Canada” and “Upper Canada” could continue to be used for legal purposes. It wasn’t until the creation of Canada and the provinces of Quebec and Ontario in 1867 that those two older names finally stopped being used. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 13:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Natural scientists by nationality etc[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete all. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:56, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nominator's rationale: Small category with only two subcategories. Hugo999 (talk) 10:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • If I understand correctly, natural scientists categories are supposed to be parent categories of e.g. biologists, physicists and chemists. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This doesn't seem to be a defining characteristic of any entries. –Aidan721 (talk) 20:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just Delete all three. The articles are well categorized and this doesn't seem defining to the articles. - RevelationDirect (talk) 02:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional characters with eye diseases[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:58, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This doesn't seem defining at all, as it can encompass characters with incredibly minor eye issues that don't affect their appearance or behavior. The subcategories are significantly less vague and broad. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, redundant category layer with only two subcategories and one article. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have interlinked the two subcats with see-also links. I also removed Hiroshi Odokawa whose list entry makes no mention of eye disease. – Fayenatic London 10:45, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional bibliophiles[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 24#Category:Fictional bibliophiles

Category:Fictional travelers[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 24#Category:Fictional travelers

Category:Fictional characters displaced in other dimensions[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:NONDEF, as it is not a trait of the characters, but rather, a situation they are in, or a feature of the story itself. It is akin to saying "fictional characters who once boarded a train". ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I would say that it would be defining for some characters, such as Luz Noceda, Anne Boonchuy, America Chavez, and Naofumi Iwatani. This is the type of category that can very easily be defining for fictional characters only. (Oinkers42) (talk) 21:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Characters like Bishop and Shard have been permanently trapped in a version of Earth which is very different than their home reality, and and this pretty much defined their status in over 30 years of stories. Dimadick (talk) 02:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Oinkers and Dimadick AHI-3000 (talk) 20:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems more similar to Category:Fictional characters displaced in time than to what Zxcvbnm suggested. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional characters from parallel universes[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: While Category:Fiction about parallel universes focuses on works about the concept of parallel universes themselves, the use of parallel universes in general is such an incredibly common thing in fiction that I don't see how this category is defining. It encompasses literally every character from somewhere that isn't "our universe", which is to say, all of fantasy fiction and a large chunk of sci-fi. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dimensional travelers[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 24#Category:Dimensional travelers

Category:Fictional displaced people[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Fictional travelers. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:01, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category:Fictional refugees already exists. This just seems to be a WP:SHAREDNAME category made by a blocked user. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:LGBT Sex Clubs[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:01, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: MOS:TITLECAPS Armadillopteryx 05:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with this change. Will existing links automatically update? Eric (talk) 06:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Native American people from the San Francisco Bay Area[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 29#Category:Native American people from the San Francisco Bay Area

Churches in the United Kingdom by century, 7th-17th century[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 24#Churches in the United Kingdom by century, 7th-17th century

Category:21st-century attacks on synagogues and Jewish communal organizations in the United States[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: procedural keep. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename to match parent article List of attacks on Jewish institutions in the United States Longhornsg (talk) 01:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Kamrupi literary figures[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I think that this category is supposed to be for writers? Mason (talk) 01:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Medieval European scribes[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 24#Category:Medieval European scribes

Category:1880s in mathematics[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. These categories are extremely underpopulated, which is unhelpful for navigation. Mason (talk) 00:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_January_16&oldid=1200499106"