Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 May 21

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< May 20 May 22 >

May 21[edit]

Category:Songwriting trios[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:36, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I can see no reasonable reason for separating songwriting teams by the number of members. Is the number of members in a team significant? Not for songwriting. Richhoncho (talk) 21:57, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support There is no need to split the parent category into such subcategories. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 03:46, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Articles using Template:Infobox music genre with invalid colour combination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 04:28, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This tracking category was for tracking when {{Infobox music genre}} was using |bgcolor= incorrectly, however this parameter has been removed after a discussion was closed regarding this parameter. Therefore this tracking category is no longer useful and should be deleted. Terasail[✉️] 17:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. I have also filed a request at WP:AWBREQ to remove all instances of this deprecated parameter, and the category is already empty. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category: Marxist historians[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: soft merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 04:32, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one article in each of these. Rathfelder (talk) 16:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Comedy-drama[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 17:29, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Article was moved recently to the noun-form title (Comedy drama without the hyphen), and the category should follow. Dicklyon (talk) 04:35, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 15:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC) [reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Jewish astronauts[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 10#Category:Jewish astronauts

Category:Wikipedians who support the Communist Party of China[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Inappropriate advocacy user category. * Pppery * it has begun... 12:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Language activists‎[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 10#Language activists‎

Category:People by nationality and period[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge all to the "Fooian people" parent. I have checked that each of the nominated categories still only contains one sub-cat, mostly "by century". – Fayenatic London 09:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary intermediate categories. The only content of each is Fooish people by century, and they are all in the appropriate Fooish people categories. Rathfelder (talk) 08:09, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree with nom in principle, but merge instead of delete, or else the by-century categories will no longer be part of the tree. For example merge Category:Zimbabwean people by period to Category:Zimbabwean people. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:02, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see - I missed that. OK Lets merge. Rathfelder (talk) 16:39, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge -- This is an unnecessary level, since the only content is a by century category. There might be scope in some cases for this, where the tree brnaches. For example in British history we may have Tudor people as well as 16th-century people. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:17, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Exactly. Its not needed for all countries. And indeed some of the periods noted in some countries - like Fooish people of the First World War - can be contained within a century. Rathfelder (talk) 15:50, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all. The opinions above disregard the existence of Category:People by millennium, applied by country here: Category:Egyptian people by millennium and also for the continent of Europe. All above and beyond can be organized by millennium and even if they aren't, purely looking at the current situation, Fooyan people by period are necessary to bridge across different systems. gidonb (talk) 04:45, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The amount of each is not the key to my opinion. The fact that this category set levels coexisting systems is. gidonb (talk) 22:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid I dont understand the point you are making. Rathfelder (talk) 15:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do not understand either. We only need container categories "by" something if the amount of subcategories becomes too large. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for allowing me to clarify. I meant the relative amount of by people millennium and by century categories. gidonb (talk) 18:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all. ― Qwerfjkltalk 14:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Places by former East German administrative division[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:42, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, this is a tree of current populated places by former (East German) administrative divisions. We do not categorize places by all administrative divisions they have ever belonged to. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment -- I can be useful to know what former administrative entity a place was in. While the places are current populated places, they also existed in 1950s to 1980s when these are current. At worst Listify. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I don't think we even need to listify them as the articles for those former divisions includes their current populated places. I assume (but am not certain) the current populated places may include their former areas so a formal list may not be needed. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:17, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as belonging to a former administrative division is not a defining characteristic of cities and towns. Renata•3 21:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Villages in Italy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 07:14, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, these are very incomplete categories and in the Italian context they are redundant because all populated places in Italy are in Category:Municipalities of Italy or in Category:Frazioni of Italy. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wholly agree. All the information can be found elsewhere, and Italy does not have the same categorisation of village as other countries do. These categories are effectively pointless. Vesuvio14 (talk) 08:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment -- We have Category:Cities and towns in Liguria and Category:Populated places in Liguria. Many years ago, we abolished most city/town/village categories due to the problem of knowing which of these a place belonged to, merging all to populated places. oes this not need a wider nom? Peterkingiron (talk) 15:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Category:Cities and towns in Liguria was established in 2004. I suspect there was merely an intention to abolish most city/town/village categories but not an implementation. Having said that, city/town/village categories are more unhelpful in Italy than in other countries because an alternative scheme with municipalities and frazioni has been elaborated in much more detail. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:08, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. ― Qwerfjkltalk 21:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1st-century BC establishments in Germany[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 8#Category:1st-century BC establishments in Germany

Category:Members of the 4th Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Tamil Nadu MLAs 1967–1972. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:38, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The name of the state didn't change to Tamil Nadu until 1969, as can be seen from 1967 Madras Legislative Assembly election. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:08, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Members of the 3rd Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The official name of the state didn't become Tamil Nadu until 1969. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:04, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Members of the 1st Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:26, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The official name of the state didn't become Tamil Nadu until 1969. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:55, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename both per nominator. Thanks to @MPGuy2824 for making these nominations. I had considered doing it myself on several occasions, but didn't have time. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:17, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Group I semiconductors[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 05:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT, probably because these materials tend to have large band gaps. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:06, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as category creator. It's been longer than six months, so WP:C2E doesn't apply, but I agree two pages isn't enough for a category. 〈 Forbes72 | Talk 〉 04:45, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_May_21&oldid=1109731523"