Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 20

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< August 19 August 21 >

August 20[edit]

Category:The Shaggs tribute albums[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 28#Category:The Shaggs tribute albums

Category:Imagicomm Communications[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:08, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No article, no category Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean, no article, what do I need to fix? ThinkingSirus1800 (talk) 14:51, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You mean to tell me that that just the INSP network article won't do for the category? ThinkingSirus1800 (talk) 15:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And the INSP is on the category. ThinkingSirus1800 (talk) 15:04, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And the Imagicomm Communications link locates to INSP. ThinkingSirus1800 (talk) 15:07, 20 August 2022 (UTC) strike sock -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:40, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, even while there is no separate article (yet) it is still a defining characteristic. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:17, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Best to build the structure connected to it before we build an article as the company ramps up. No issue with this category. Nate • (chatter) 23:44, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Despite the socking, my vote! remains the same. Nate • (chatter) 02:59, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Defunct code search engines[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: upmerge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:09, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT; only one page (Google Code Search) and unlikely to grow significantly. Retro (talk | contribs) 14:05, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree in principle but merge to parent categories instead of a plain deletion. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:19, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Indeed, upmerging was my intended resolution; it's more of a WP:NARROWCAT than completely inappropriate. Retro (talk | contribs) 11:26, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Jammu and Kashmir[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 28#Category:Jammu and Kashmir

Category:Afro-Latinx visual artists[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 28#Category:Afro-Latinx visual artists

Sport by raion[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete all. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:15, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, this is a very poorly populated tree (many raions are not even represented in this tree), it is better to organize this at oblast level than at raion level. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fiction about monsters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:16, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Fiction about monsters is absolutely its own genre and can be named accordingly. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:15, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:03, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose The current title has a clearer definition. Dimadick (talk) 06:04, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 09:04, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Löbau (Lubawa)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: soft merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:17, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, we do not need a separate category by every former name of a populated place (with some exceptions like Byzantium/Constantinople/Istanbul). Marcocapelle (talk) 16:38, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 09:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Prussia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:17, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename to clarify the purpose of the category in contrast to Category:People from Prussia proper, aligning with article title Kingdom of Prussia. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:25, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 09:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

History of Sucre[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 28#History of Sucre

Category:People from the Crimean Oblast[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 28#Category:People from the Crimean Oblast

Deaths from stroke[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting
more countries and country subdivisions
Nominator's rationale: delete, trivial cause of death. Follow-up on this earlier discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:32, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Rathfelder, Lugnuts, Pppery, and Dimadick: pinging contributors to previous discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:35, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 09:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all per nom: An extremely common cause of death and non-notable as a result. If we had this, we would end up having a huge amount of similar categories to a point of drain on the project's servers. It also is not really a category that is going to ever be complete, as a result of how common it is.— Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 14:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom. Cause of death rarely defines a life. Rathfelder (talk) 21:07, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom and Rathfelder. The nuances of a particular individual's death are probably better described in prose. And when the cause of death is a defining characteristic, the death event will usually have its own article. Looking at the articles that populate the categories in this nomination, they appear to be almost entirely biographies of individuals. Retro (talk | contribs) 14:05, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Coal miner organizers[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 30#Category:Coal miner organizers

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_August_20&oldid=1107604120"