Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 March 15

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< March 14 March 16 >

March 15[edit]

Category:Bajo Nuevo Bank[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:52, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one article. It appears that all relevant parent cats. are already present in the article. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Little room for growth since it's such a small cay. RevelationDirect (talk) 23:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: will never contain anything other than the one article in the category, unnecessary categorisation. Richard3120 (talk) 16:58, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Doris Lessing[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:53, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:OCEPON --woodensuperman 16:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This was a good-faith creation by me a few years ago. I would prefer that it be kept, but I understand it is in conflict with WP:OCEPON. —Bruce1eetalk 08:36, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Macedonia and international organisations[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename all per expanded nomination.
(Note: I did participate in this discussion, so I am WP:INVOLVED ... but since every comment supports the proposal, this is an undisputed case per WP:INVOLVED. So I am closing now as part of an effort to clear the big CFD backlog.) --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming:
Nominator's rationale: for consistency within Category:Ambassadors of North Macedonia. At WP:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 February 16#North_Macedonia, the nomination excluded categories which refer to the participation of the country in international organisations such as the United Nations, which sometimes uses a name different to the name chosen by Wikipedia's naming policies. However, the UN immediately adopted the new name, see this citation from the main article: "On Thursday afternoon, the UN Protocol and Liaison Service announced the official switch over within the UN, from the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, to the new name of North Macedonia."[1] NATO [2] and EU [3] are also using it. – Fayenatic London 08:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. As noted above, I excluded these from the mass nomination of 650 categories at WP:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 February 16#North_Macedonia. That was because usage with those organisations has been hotly disputed, and i thought it best that these formerly v controversial categories be given individual consideration.
The evidence presented by @Fayenatic london demonstrates that all three international organisations have updated their usage to adopt the new time created as a result of the Prespa agreement. So I think that the case for renaming is clear.
Thanks for FL for doing the research, and for being so nice about my pedantic oppose of doing this via speedy. These international orgs were kinda the epicentre of the now-resolved dispute, so I think that being cautious and bringing it to full discussion was best.
However, I note that there are parent and sibling categories which should also be renamed: Category:Republic of Macedonia and the United Nations Category:United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning the Republic of Macedonia, Category:Republic of Macedonia–European Union relations, Category:Ambassadors of the European Union to the Republic of Macedonia. Would you like to add them to the nom, @FL?--BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:15, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Gladly. – Fayenatic London 09:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support all - there seems to be very little actual Wikipedian opposition to the change from 'Republic of Macedonia' to 'North Macedonia'. Oculi (talk) 10:22, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support all, consistent with actual usage of the name "North Macedonia" in these organizations. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:21, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support seems entirely legit, based on the general acceptance of the new nomenclature. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:40, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support all but there should be a headnote explaining that it includes the period before the change of name. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Mosques in Sri Lanka by city[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge one, delete others per nominator. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge redundant category layer, with only one subcategory for the capital of the country. The district and province categories are also container categories containing only one subcategory, ultimately only for the mosques of the capital of the country. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Coptic Catholics[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: upmerge. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:34, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge as a redundant category layer with only one subcategory. Note that the majority of Coptic Christians is not Catholic but Oriental Orthodox. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

People of the Abbasid Caliphate[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 May 11#People of the Abbasid Caliphate

Category:Recipients of the Aceh Medal[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:25, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:PERFCAT and WP:OCAWARD (WP:NONDEFINING)
According to the Aceh Medal article, "All soldiers participating in the First Aceh Expedition and/or the first six months of the Second Aceh Expedition were entitled award of the medal." We generally avoid categorizing by campaign medals because it creates clutter for career officers. While a lot of soldiers must have received this award, the category only contains one article which I added ("listified"?) here in the main article. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Background We've deleted similar categories for campaign medals from other countries here, here, here, here, here and here. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • By All Means - Too much clutter, too little time. :( Anomalous+0 (talk) 11:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Plain delete -- Campaign medals are awarded for being there and are inherently NN. Unusually, I doubt that we need to listify. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:35, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_March_15&oldid=896564193"