Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 January 15

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< January 14 January 16 >

January 15[edit]

Category:Pikes[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (merged contents to Category:Former toll roads in the United States). Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Pike is ambiguous. Another option would be to delete since this is a grouping by roads that include 'pike'. The other option would be to upmerge to Category:Toll roads in the United States. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Adamsville, Alabama[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. Has only 2 entries. ...William 17:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Upmerge Small town which is unlikely to garner many biographies. SFB 18:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Upmerge per nom. kennethaw88 • talk 04:36, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Upmerge per nom. The rule is not that every place that exists automatically gets its own separate "People from" category; we create these only when we have enough articles about people from that place to justify them, and leave people catted at the level of the most appropriate parent division (county, state, etc.) until numbers warrant. Bearcat (talk) 20:37, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Heflin, Alabama[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. Small one county community with 3 entries. ...William 15:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Upmerge Small town which is unlikely to garner many biographies. SFB 18:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC))[reply]
  • Upmerge per nom. kennethaw88 • talk 04:36, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Upmerge per nom. The rule is not that every place that exists automatically gets its own separate "People from" category; we create these only when we have enough articles about people from that place to justify them, and leave people catted at the level of the most appropriate parent division (county, state, etc.) until numbers warrant. Bearcat (talk) 20:38, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Articles published in peer-reviewed literature[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Wikipedia articles published in peer-reviewed literature. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: doesn't seem to be worth having. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.109.162.13 (talk) 08:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename to Category:Wikipedia articles published in peer-reviewed literature and change to a hidden category. Not sure if this category will really expand, but I'm sure there is much administrative use for the category if it does. SFB 18:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename per SFB. It will be unusual for a WP article to carry such weight. I do occasionally see WP articles cited in academic literature, but becasue they are not peer-reviewed in the normal sense and at risk of having WP:OR added, this is unusual. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename if Kept no opinion on whether or not to keep it though but, if we have it, should start with "Wikipedia". RevelationDirect (talk) 05:04, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename The current name suggests this contains entries in Wikipedia on specific articles. While there may be some articles published in Professional Journals that have been so impactful that they are notable enough to be included in wikipedia, I know of none off the top of my head that have an article. For example, to pick an article that has been given a best article award by a professional association, we could have an article on 'Saviors on Mount Zion": Mormon Sacramentalism, Mortality, and the Baptism for the Dead. I doubt we would. Even most books don't get articles in wikipedia, but that is where I thought this category was heading. I would however for that type of entry in wikipedia have the category be named Category:Articles in academic journals or something along those lines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:06, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sarwari Qadiri order[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:04, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No more articles reasonably expected to be added since Sarwari Qadiri was deleted per XfD. kashmiri TALK 01:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Since there is only 1 article left, this category doesn't aid navigation. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Font Bureau typefaces[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:  Relisted at 2015 JAN 26 CFD. Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category merged with article Font_Bureau. David Condrey log talk 01:37, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Highlife albums by Nigerian artists[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:  Relisted at 2015 FEB 4 CFD. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:11, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The scheme at Category:Highlife albums by artist nationality was deleted. This is too small and narrow to support. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:47, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_January_15&oldid=1138408610"