The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Keep. Timrollpickering (talk) 22:03, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Hmains etc Johnbod (talk) 16:38, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Upmerge. Timrollpickering (talk) 08:53, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Most of the articles relate to health generally, and any relating to particular health events or disasters can go to Category:Health disasters in India which is the standard “by country” category for health disasters. Hugo999 (talk) 05:38, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Keep. Timrollpickering (talk) 12:48, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There is no reason why these people should not be able to identify with their ethnic group.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:36, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
CommentUnwanted? What in the world is that supposed to mean? Pichpich (talk) 14:53, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Speedy rename C2D. Timrollpickering (talk) 20:15, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The radio network/syndicator relating to this category has/is in the process of changing its name to reflect a merger involving its parent company; that should be reflected in the category name. WCQuidditch☎✎ 02:26, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
