Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 December 28

< December 27	December 29 >

December 28[edit]

Category:Indian Muslim Scientists and Scholars[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Timrollpickering (talk) 21:45, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Delete Unnecessary three-way intersection between nationality, religion and occupation. Pichpich (talk) 21:58, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- an unnecessary triple intersection. Indian Muslims are effectively a caste. Anyway "scientists and scholars" is far too broad to be a single category. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:39, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the three-way intersection is not justified.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:44, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Proposed ships of the Canadian Forces[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. This really should have been a rename instead of creating a new category and moving everything, but it all comes out the same in the end. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:12, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Delete. Replaced by Category:Proposed ships of the Royal Canadian Navy. Plasma east (talk) 19:50, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Callable Bull/Bear Contracts issued in Hong Kong Stock Exchange[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Category:Companies quoted on Hong Kong Stock Exchange can be created if desired. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: I don't see any other category where a derivative is listed by both type and location. And I also don't see any other callable bull/bear contract categories.-- Mike Selinker (talk) 19:04, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- The correct title would appear to be Category:Companies in whose shares callable Bull/Bear Contracts issued in Hong Kong Stock Exchange. This is going to be very difficult to keep up to date, as companies come and go. I doubt we need to go furhter than Category:Companies quoted on Hong Kong Stock Exchange. The one article; that I checked did not mention CBBCs in its text, leading me to believe that this is not a notable characteristic. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:46, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is way to specific, and not even clearly properly named.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:45, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Universal Sports affiliates[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Timrollpickering (talk) 16:51, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Delete. Network will no longer exist as a broadcast subchannel network after January 1, and all category links to their stations have now been removed, so category is empty. Nate • (chatter) 03:05, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.