Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Cewbot 2

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was  Approved.

Cewbot 2

• (BRFA
• Approved BRFAs
• talk
• contribs
• count
• SUL
• logs
• page moves
• block log
• rights log
• flag)

Operator: Kanashimi (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 07:04, Tuesday, January 21, 2020 (UTC)

Function overview: Update the section counts and article assessment icons for all levels of Wikipedia:Vital articles. Per this BOTREQ.

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): wikiapi on GitHub

Source code available: 20200122.update vital articles.js on GitHub

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Bot0612 9, Wikipedia talk:Vital articles/Level/5#Inactive Bot

Edit period(s): daily

Estimated number of pages affected: About 60, list here.

Namespace(s): Wikipedia

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Update the section counts and article assessment icons for all levels of Wikipedia:Vital articles.

• The bot only update counter with the pattern "(000 articles)" in section title.
• All attributes of articles get from corresponding categories.

Discussion

Approved for trial (1 full run). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Pretty straight forward since it's just a carbon-copy of an existing (approved) task, but let's just make sure things are still working appropriately. Primefac (talk) 01:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Trial complete. Please check the contribs, Thank you. --Kanashimi (talk) 10:06, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

There was some discussions in the BOTREQ, so I fix code and do some more test edit. --Kanashimi (talk) 22:13, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

The test edit was finished. --Kanashimi (talk) 09:20, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

 Approved. If there are minor changes to the code that improve functionality there is approval for that, but any major shifts or changes should be brought up on the talk page for review. Primefac (talk) 18:58, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.