Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/February 2007/

Case Filed On: 17:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedian filing request:

• Dacy69 (talk · contribs)

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:

• Fadix (talk · contribs)
• Fedayee (talk · contribs)

Wikipedia pages this pertains to:

• Armenian Revolutionary Federation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Questions:

Have you read the AMA FAQ?

• Answer:Yes

How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)

• Answer: Content Dispute and Personal Attack

What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.

• Answer:I was insulted two times. I see no avenue to resort to dispute resoltuon except Arbitration

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

• Answer:Proper editing and punishment of users who constantly insult

Summary:

On page Armenian Revolutionary Federation I made edit based on the referenced information. I wanted add more sources and more information but the page got protected. Without much discussion user Fadix insulted me 2 times [1] and threatened with edit revenge on other Wiki pages [2]. User Fedayee also insulted me, in supporting Fadix claim [3]. I filed 2 complains about personal attacks but no measure has been taken except warning for 1st insults after which Fadix insulted a second time.

Followup:

When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

• Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

• Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

• Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

• Answer:

AMA Information

Case Status: NEW

Advocate Status:

• None assigned.