Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zura Barayeva

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 03:44, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zura Barayeva[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability. Axakov (talk) 14:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This discussion page created without the afd2 template and was never listed on a log page. I've fixed this--no comment on the nom itself. --Finngall ^talk 18:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 19:30, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Keep, obviously notable enough that you found the article, created an account, and posted for deletion. MicroPaLeo (talk) 10:57, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - no reason given for deletion. The stub has two good references. Bearian (talk) 01:17, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - no reasons for nom or deletion are given. as per Bearian the article has two sources and is currently a stub that we can work on.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:41, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a quick search on her name provides ample evidence that she is notable. The article needs improvement, someone should expand the article on her.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.