Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZsKnight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --Daniel Olsen 03:27, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ZsKnight[edit]

While zsKnight has done some great stuff for the SNES emulation community, he appears to fail WP:BIO. I am looking to have this article deleted or redirected to the ZSNES article. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 00:57, 17 December 2006 (UTC) }}[reply]

Delete, assuming no reliable sources are found. I can't find any. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 01:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Fails WP:BIO. MER-C 02:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:BIO-DESU 02:19, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This person seems notable at first glance, but fails the biography policy in the long run. Atlantis Hawk 02:58, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Split Infinity ^(talk) 03:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above concerns and of course Notability. — Seadog^Talk 03:55, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with the above concerns. Somitho 05:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:BIO criteria. Ter e nc e Ong 05:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with ZSNES, although I find an almost uncanny resemblance of this AFD with Doug Bell. bibliomaniac 1 5 06:01, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Koweja 06:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete while zsKnight is awesome, the rest of the world has failed to notice it, so he remains non-notable. Koweja 06:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO -- Selmo ^(talk) 06:41, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Smerge/redirect to ZSNES. --- RockMFR 07:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Smerge to ZSNES. SkierRMH,07:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable, and per nom. Same thing I guess. --Tohru Honda13^{Sign here!} 18:36, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above - The RSJ 23:56, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this is the most widely used SNES emulator ever. SUrely the developers are notable at least for a stub. Milto LOL pia 03:02, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While ZSNES may be the most widely-used SNES emulator on the Intel platform, the developer is not notable. He has only created one product of significance, and therefore should be included in the ZSNES article and nothing but. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 03:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.