Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZhengMa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. W.marsh 01:47, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ZhengMa[edit]

original research and non-notable. Onknkrpwxq 15:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep. Ships with Windows, would pass WP:SOFTWARE. Currently no sources are cited, though since it ships with Windows, there would definitely be sources for this. Therefore it does not fail WP:V. An article is not deleted just because it currently has no references. --- RockMFR 21:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment what is this "Windows" you speak of? Is that something notable? Ok, ok, I kid, but as someone who has never used Windows, I have no way of verifying this claim. Please provide some references. Xtifr _tälk 10:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Needs some cleanup and references, but definantly passes WP:SOFTWARE. --Lim e tom 00:58, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, although I don't agree that this is software - it is an input method implemented in Windows, not a separate product. The reason I think it should be kept is that the article on Chinese input methods for computers has wikilinks to this and a number of other wikipedia articles on input methods, and many of those other articles are good: Cangjie method, Boshiamy method, and Dayi method, to pick just three from the top of the list. Based on those three, it looks to me like this article could be similarly expanded. John Broughton | Talk 17:56, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.