Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhang Jingzhe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I left a small, nonpartisan procedural comment in this discussion, but I think the consensus is clear enough that I don't think that affects my ability to close this as an administrator. Mz7 (talk) 03:37, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zhang Jingzhe[edit]

Zhang Jingzhe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating for Sir Sputnik - Reason: Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. KnowledgeChuck (talk) 17:33, 5 May 2018 (UTC)This account is a sockpuppet. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 01:59, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. KnowledgeChuck (talk) 17:35, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. KnowledgeChuck (talk) 17:35, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@KnowledgeChuck: What do you mean by "Nominating for Sir Sputnik"? Sir Sputnik is an experienced editor, perfectly capable of nominating a page for deletion himself if he wishes to. Breaking sticks (talk) 22:17, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Breaking sticks: I PROD'ed this article. My guess is Chuck thought this was procedurally ineligible for PROD and so passed my proposal on to AfD. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:31, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:31, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above, having not played in a fully pro league thus failing WP:NFOOTBALL. Govvy (talk) 10:05, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:38, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Coolabahapple: Actually, not quite. Since the sockpuppet removed a PROD before making the AfD nomination, the technically correct procedure would be to revert both those edits and leave the PROD to run its course. However, once a discussion is under way it may as well be allowed to finish. Breaking sticks (talk) 22:00, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No, the sockpuppet was the one that was technically correct. The article was PROD'd unsuccessfully once before, so Sir Sputnik's PROD tag was the second time a PROD tag was added to the article, making it ineligible. The technically correct procedure would have been for Sir Sputnik to have nominated it to AfD from the start. Mz7 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 11:16, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.