Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zetafax

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:45, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zetafax[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Was prodded/deprodded years ago). Article about one product from a non-notable company. The only news article about it is a Forbes piece reviewing five different fax products. B (talk) 18:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. B (talk) 18:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --Devokewater@ 23:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article has been around for a long time, and faxes have dwindled in importance since then. (I just removed a market-penetration claim from the page that has been in <citation needed> status for years, and is almost certainly incorrect now.) Thanks! — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 16:58, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Subject lacks proper sourcing that establishes notability, and the article reads more like a promotional blurb than anything else.TH1980 (talk) 01:45, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.