Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero world government

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Governance without government. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zero world government[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As I hadn't heard of the term "zero world government" before, and I noticed the single cited source in this article didn't mention it, I looked into it on Google Scholar. This search only turned up 3 results for the term, none of which go into further depth on it than a definition.[1] On the other hand, the other leading term "governance without government" (which already has its own article) turned up 14,500 results,[2] while the term "governance beyond the nation state" turned up 2,110.[3] As there appears to be no substantial coverage in reliable services of the term "zero world government", I propose this be deleted and any (little) relevant information from this article merged into the article on governance without government. Grnrchst (talk) 20:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Grnrchst (talk) 20:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Governance without government: The article literally mentions "governance without governance" as an alternative description, yet does not expand much on the existing article. Os ari us 11:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Osarius. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 14:37, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO. No evidence of major usage outside of Wikipedia.130.132.173.198 (talk) 18:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Osarius. There seems to be hardly anything there that isn't covered in the G without G article ++Lar: t/c 14:24, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.