Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zerg Infestation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userfied, author had moved it to his/her userspace for more work. (non-admin closure) Command and Conquer Expert! ^{speak to me...}_{review me...} 22:05, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zerg Infestation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced video game article - no indication of notability Mean as custard (talk) 17:34, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete - It appears to be a game mod, therefore it's highly unlikely to be notable. No references whatsoever in the article, couldn't find anything whatsoever on it in Google. Fancruft/promotional writing style as well. Lukeno94 (talk) 18:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable and written promotionally. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 18:33, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non notable and not written from a NPOV. Command and Conquer Expert! ^{speak to me...}_{review me...} 18:51, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it is notable, I don't know why Lukeno said he couldn't find anything, I googled it just now and tons of results about it came up. It's not promotional since I didn't create it and no one makes money off wc3 maps anyway. Misterrobot (talk) 19:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'm going to try my hardest to WP:AGF here. The ONE thing I saw directly named "Zerg infestation" was a YouTube video. There is not a single piece of coverage in reliable sources about this game mod. Any game mod would have to have substantial coverage in reliable sources just to have a section in the game it was based off, let alone its own article. That blatantly isn't the case here. Please read WP:GNG, WP:RS, and WP:ISNOT. Finally, you can write anything promotionally without being directly connected to the project... Lukeno94 (talk) 20:39, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Add Sheep Tag to the nomination for exactly the same reasons. . . Mean as custard (talk) 19:18, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I AfDed it separately - apparently, it's been deleted thrice before... Lukeno94 (talk) 20:46, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete very, very, very, very few game mods are notable, and this isn't one. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:30, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.