Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeppotron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep - Liberatore(T) 17:38, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zeppotron[edit]

Previously Prod'd for the reasons of having no clear evidence of notability, and quite probably being advertising. Delete for the same reason. I also invite other users to take a look at the articles about their films that this user has created, as if this article goes, they most likely should as well. --InShaneee 20:01, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ per nom; fails to establish notability per WP:CORP. --Alan Au 20:30, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete. Marginally better as rewritten, but still a bit light on content and needs to make a stronger case for notability. --Alan Au 23:25, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the article is crap, but they are a notable if small production company, as can be seen from some of the linked articles which aired on network television (8 Out of 10 Cats, Space Cadets). I'll have a go at some cleanup. — sjorford (talk) 21:49, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak~~ Keep - I'm not sure it meets WP:CORP, but I've heard of the company and its related to plenty of notable subjects. Alternatively, merge into Endemol. —Whouk (talk) 22:19, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Can't see any problem here- article is very clean. -- JJay 22:33, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep The article is just a stub at the moment, but the company has existed for some years and produced some significant satirical material in the UK media - TV Go Home, Nathan Barley, elements of the Brass Eye special. The article can be expanded to encompass the rest of Brooker's et al accomplishments. (aeropagitica) 23:22, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. They're pretty notable, and there's nothing wrong with the article here. -Colin Kimbrell 18:18, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Article needs expanding, but Zeppotron are (increasingly) notable in UK broadcast media. TomStuart 09:53, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Certainly notable enough. Stubs grow. --Bonalaw 13:49, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.