Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zenarchy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge/redirect to Buddhist anarchism. I will redirect, editors are free to merge verifiable material. Jujutacular ^talk 22:28, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zenarchy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neologism, any meaningful content can be covered at Buddhist anarchism. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:11, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect into Buddhist anarchism. It doesn't look like much more can be said about this; it's yet another one-off social theory without serious study or academic recognition. --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 06:14, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 22:36, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Kerry Wendell Thornley. Some Google Books discuss it but only related to the author and as parody, as opposed to substantive coverage in reliable sources treating this as philosophical school or tradition. Hekerui (talk) 14:43, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into the author's page. Some few mentions in Google books and some passing mentions in Google News or Google Scholar aren't enough for a standalone article when there is an author's article also. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:36, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.