Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zef

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 15:47, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zef[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable / Neologism / WP:NOT#DICTIONARY. Fails WP:V. Suggest redirect to Die Antwoord. Widefox; talk 21:11, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Some sources: [1], [2], [3]. I think there's enough for WP:V. --Sammy1339 (talk) 23:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Crucially, see Comment below. Widefox; talk 20:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:31, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:31, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - We're swimming in good sources. Here's a couple more: Mother Jones, New York Times Magazine. ∴ ZX95 ^[discuss] 14:39, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto independent of

Comment How many sources show notability for Zef, not Die Antwoord? WP:NOTINHERITED. Passing mentions of Zef by them are primary, non-independent. They need to be WP:SECONDARY, independent. Articles about Zef. At least two of them for WP:GNG. Sources about Die Antwoord, passing mentions in articles about them only confirm no independent notability, suggest merge and redirect to section. Widefox; talk 20:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:59, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The 2013 merger discussion at Die Antwoord#Merge proposal Zef got this right; zef is obviously a well-covered notable concept, and reliable sources say it's not the same thing as Die Antwoord. (Some HighBeam sources for Jack Parow as a "zef" artist: [4].) --Arxiloxos (talk) 05:34, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.