Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeeshan Aziz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:46, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zeeshan Aziz[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be referenced by press releases. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 19:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 19:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 19:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 19:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I dream of horses, Sources are not PRs, If you mention any, I will delete that. Their are many authentic sources about subject.~-Ameen Akbar (talk) 21:00, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While there are reliable sources mentioning the subject, they are mainly passing mentions (which isn't unusual for someone working in journalism). The exception to this are the Daily Pakistan and UrduPoint articles, which focus on the subject. However, those two articles by themselves aren't enough to build the case for notability. This is a person still at the start of their career so it's possible enough reliable sources proving notability will emerge in the coming years, but for now the article is too soon.--SouthernNights (talk) 18:24, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Daily Pakistan, UrduPoint, Mashable Pakistan and Siasat.pk News Blog are some reliable sources.-Ameen Akbar (talk) 19:38, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per SouthernNights. The Daily Pakistan and UrduPoint articles are actually the same article and that, given the tone (ex: telling the reader to follow the subject on Twitter), points to it being a paid PR article. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:53, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
From what I see, this is the Daily Pakistan article, and this is the UrduPoint one. They look like different articles to me. However, according to both articles Aziz is associated with UrduPoint which means it is not an WP:Independent source. But the Daily Pakistan source looks fine to me. Finally, I understand what you're saying about the tone, but I think that the journalistic culture in that part of the world is different.VR _talk 02:17, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mhawk10 (talk) 05:38, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:55, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete One reliable source found, rest are mentions in passing. Oaktree b (talk) 00:21, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.