Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:40, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zeel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. It did not meet the Depth of coverage criteria. Echoasis (talk) 21:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails WP:NOTPROMOTION. The article has been carefully maintained by a single account (the page creator) that appears to be directly linked to someone in this company's marketing department. This obviously an undisclosed WP:COI, probably to take advantage of the credibility a Wikipedia page offers. It should be deleted to discourage that kind of behavior. - GretLomborg (talk) 05:42, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. IMO, it also fails CORP. John from Idegon (talk) 05:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.