Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zedrick Restauro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jujutacular (talk) 02:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zedrick Restauro[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails our subject specific notability policy of WP:NACTOR. Subject has not played any significant role in the mainstream films, only minor roles. Other than WP:SPSs and unreliable sites, I can't see any significant coverage in third party reliable sources other than few passing mentions. Fails WP:GNG. Jim Carter 10:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari ^Hangout 13:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari ^Hangout 13:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari ^Hangout 13:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Average and ordinary actor with no outstandingly obvious improvement. SwisterTwister talk 18:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:50, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Fails WP:NACTOR with only minor roles - does not seem to meet any of the 3 criteria: 1 Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. 2 Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. 3 Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. --Jersey92 (talk) 05:00, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as has been so ably pointed out, he doesn't currently meet WP:NACTOR, and searches didn't turn up enough in-depth coverage to show he passes WP:GNG. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.