Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZeckoZICK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 18:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ZeckoZICK[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable singer who doesn’t satisfy any criterion from WP:SINGER. A before search shows they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them, thus this is a GNG fail also. Celestina007 (talk) 20:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Check this out please https://m.industry.co.id/read/67428/rapper-zeckozick-rilis-ulang-lagu-lama — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andisetia21 (talk • contribs) 20:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:27, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Found one mention in those Industry Website which clearly do not establish sufficient notability. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, no problem. please save this in case of improvement. and anyone can help fix it. thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andisetia21 (talk • contribs) 03:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Save. This article is in the form of a stub, which may still be developed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxantonio28 (talk • contribs) 17:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)~~ [reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NSINGER, plus lack of coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This seems like a reliable source but [1] and [2] have published the same article, and Medium is unreliable. --Ashley yoursmile! 07:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I've fixed some of the source errors listed. Please maintain this article and anyone can help develop it. Thank you.--Andisetia21 (talk) 13:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

— Andisetia21 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

~~Keep~~ Fixed. In my opinion, because this is a stub article, it must be maintained. I have contributed several reliable sources in this article.--114.79.47.26 (talk) 13:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator's note: The above IP has no contributions to the article. I have struck their !vote as it is presumptively a duplicate vote by a registered user. —C.Fred (talk) 15:28, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Can still be improved. There will be many reliable sources for this article.--Maxantonio28 (talk) 14:09, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

— Maxantonio28 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Comment — Let the closing admin note that this article is being infiltrated by possible sock puppets. Celestina007 (talk) 16:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Checkuser note: I have struck the comments by Andisetia21 and Maxantonio28 per WP:SOCKSTRIKE because they are confirmed sockpuppets of each other; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andisetia21. Mz7 (talk) 05:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Is there objection if, in the event this closes as a delete result, the article is instead sent to Draft: space for incubation? —C.Fred (talk) 23:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred, I object to this because I’m not sure I understand the essence of draftifying when the creator of the article has now been indef blocked for sock-puppetry. Coupled with the fact the subject of the article isn’t going to be notable anytime soon I don’t see a plausible reason for incubation. Celestina007 (talk) 15:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestina007: Given the sockpuppetry issue, I don't object to your objection. (I was AGF'ing still with one of the editors now blocked as a sock and modeling how to request asking for draftification.) —C.Fred (talk) 20:19, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non notable Indonesian singer. Stvbastian (talk) 23:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.