Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zebraic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect all to ApologetiX per consensus (non-admin closure per WP:BOLD). HĐ (talk) 09:01, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zebraic[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this album meets the criteria at WP:NALBUMS and the only cited source is the record sleeve. FalconK (talk) 10:18, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 10:18, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages which are substantially identical (there is a page for each album this band released, having exactly the same format and general lack of citations or any evidence of notability):

Redirect all to ApologetiX - no justification for a separate article for any of them Spiderone 11:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I second this suggestion and reasoning. Theleekycauldron (talk) 11:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect all to ApologetiX - 44 albums in 28 years, plus 14 compilations and live albums and Xmas albums etc. etc., and not a single one of them got any reliable media notice and are only ever discussed within the band's esoteric fan community. The band themselves are low on media coverage too. It looks like they enjoy cranking out material for a committed group of fans but haven't crossed to the maninstream. If they're having fun with such an effort, good for them, but their releases have never attracted the notice necessary for notability in Wikipedia. Also, all the articles are mostly the work of the same two or three editors, and it looks like they're trying to assemble a comprehensive discography for purposes of fan trivia. That must be done elsewhere. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect all to ApologetiX - I worked on a few of these, but that was a long time ago. I don't think any of them are notable per Wiki's standards.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 01:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.