Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zazen (band)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:51, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Zazen (band)[edit]
- Zazen (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable band, fails WP:GNG. - TheMagnificentist 16:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:01, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 12:10, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 12:10, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable band, fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:BAND. A WP:BEFORE search indicates a distinct lack ofpersistent, in-depth coverage in reliable sources. — fortunavelut luna 09:24, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 09:28, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 09:28, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:BAND. FITINDIA 09:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Subject lacks notablitiy. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:04, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.